Is Defense Research Valued by Graduate Schools?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hetaeros
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Research
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a third-year physics student seeking advice on applying for summer research programs, particularly in defense research. The student has prior research experience that was not particularly fruitful or relevant to physics, leading to concerns about the value of defense research for graduate school applications. Participants in the discussion clarify that defense research is not inherently dismissed by graduate schools, but the potential for classified work could limit publication opportunities. They emphasize that the skills gained and references obtained from such experiences are often more important than the specific nature of the research. The student specifies an interest in intelligence analysis related to scientific and technological strategies rather than traditional lab work, noting examples of graduates working in defense-related roles.
hetaeros
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hello All!

I'm a third-year physics student attending a private university here in the States and am currently applying to summer research programs. While I have applied to the traditional SULI and DAAD RISE (German Exchange) programs, I'm also interested in defense research at programs such as the http://www.ida.org/careers/graduatestudents.php" .

I've done two summers of "research" (although they weren't very productive--my first summer was with a lab that was going through the grant-writing frenzy consuming everybody and my second summer was setting up an undergraduate-run research lab) and I admit that they probably did not hold much experience. In fact, they weren't very "physics-y"--the first lab was microfluidics and the second lab was synthetic biology. I was curious as to whether graduate schools welcome defense research or dismiss it as irrelevant. I feel a bit as if this is my last chance to set up a good bit of research (I'm taking the grad-course route to an honors BA as opposed to the thesis route) and would like to know some opinions, especially those of you who are on admissions committees or have gone through similar experiences.

Thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why would defence research be "dismissed as irrelevant?" The only issue that might arise is that your work could end up classified and hence not publishible in contrast to work done in an academic institution. A similar situation might occur for work done for a private company. I wouldn't be too concerned about that at an undergraduate level though as publications for a undergrad are very rare. What's usually the most important with such work are the skills you pick up, and the references you get.
 
Choppy said:
Why would defence research be "dismissed as irrelevant?" The only issue that might arise is that your work could end up classified and hence not publishible in contrast to work done in an academic institution. A similar situation might occur for work done for a private company. I wouldn't be too concerned about that at an undergraduate level though as publications for a undergrad are very rare. What's usually the most important with such work are the skills you pick up, and the references you get.

I apologize for being vague. I meant defense research more in terms of intelligence analysis, especially in terms of scientific/technological strategies as opposed to actual labwork.
 
I know a mechanical engineer graduated high in his class from Dartmouth has an amazing paying job, but spends his days designing radio mounts for Canadian military hummers, or finding the strongest alloy for lug nuts, stuff like that.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top