Is Detonation a Physical or Chemical Reaction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mechaniac
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chemical
AI Thread Summary
Detonation of high explosives like TNT and RDX involves both physical and chemical processes. The initial shockwave compresses and heats the explosive, leading to chemical reactions that release energy, primarily as heat and kinetic energy of product particles. This process creates a chain reaction resulting in an explosion, where combustion principles apply since fuel and oxidant are present within the explosive. While detonation is fundamentally a physical process, the energy driving it originates from chemical reactions similar to combustion. The discussion also highlights the military applications of such explosives, particularly in advanced weaponry like the AGM-114 Hellfire missiles.
Mechaniac
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
1.The explosion resulting from the detonation of High explosives likes TNT ,RDX ...are they chemical reactions at all ,because the initiation requires detonation waves and no flame or oxidation as such .

2.Detonation is followed by rapid expansion of gases accompanied by shockwaves .

3.Can somebody throw light on the mechanics of this reaction .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The initial shockwave that sets off the explosion simply compresses and heats the explosive. At a certain density and temperature the explosive starts to undergo chemical reactions that release energy. Most of this energy is released as heat in the form of kinetic energy of the product particles. Like the initial shockwave, these particles heat up and compress the explosive even more, with the end result is a chain reaction that is the explosion.
 
Combustion requires heat, fuel, and oxidant. Fuel and oxidant are both present within the explosive. Heat is provided by compression from detonation wave.

The process of detonation is a physical process, but the energy to drive detonation wave comes from a chemical process which is identical to that of combustion.
 
Hey I'm late in my expression of gratitude but thanks you guys helped.
 
Mechaniac, In case you would like to examine a specific kind of detonation, here's a real example used by our government:
“The MQ-9 Reaper drone can carry up to 14 AGM-114 Hellfire air-to-ground missiles. The MQ-1 Predator can carry 2 Hellfires. Each missile carries a warhead: the AGM-114M Hellfire II warhead is the Blast fragmentation/incendiary type, and the AGM-114N Hellfire II carries the Metal augmented charge (MAC) (Thermobaric) warhead. This thermobaric weapon, which includes the type known as a "fuel-air bomb", is an explosive weapon that produces a blast wave of a significantly longer duration than those produced by condensed explosives. This is useful in military applications where its longer duration increases the numbers of casualties and causes more damage to structures.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AGM-114
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metal_augmented_charge
 
I think it's easist first to watch a short vidio clip I find these videos very relaxing to watch .. I got to thinking is this being done in the most efficient way? The sand has to be suspended in the water to move it to the outlet ... The faster the water , the more turbulance and the sand stays suspended, so it seems to me the rule of thumb is the hose be aimed towards the outlet at all times .. Many times the workers hit the sand directly which will greatly reduce the water...
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top