Is Energy Scalar or Vector, and How Does Dimensionality Affect It?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter big_bounce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy Scalar Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of energy, specifically whether it is a scalar or a vector, and how dimensionality might influence its classification. Participants explore theoretical implications and definitions related to energy in physics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that energy is a scalar, questioning the notion that it could be a vector.
  • One participant suggests that energy is both a scalar and a vector, proposing that it is a quaternion quantity that includes a scalar and three vectors.
  • Another participant argues that if energy were a vector, conservation of energy would not hold in certain scenarios, such as uniform circular motion.
  • A later reply challenges the idea of energy being a vector, stating that energy density is a scalar component of the stress-energy-momentum tensor.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of claims made by a participant who introduces unconventional ideas about energy and dimensionality, with some labeling it as "crackpot" reasoning.
  • There is a mention of the relationship between momentum and energy, with one participant discussing how they might be combined in theoretical frameworks.
  • Another participant points out that the cross product, which is often associated with vector quantities, does not apply in four-dimensional space.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on whether energy is a scalar, a vector, or both, with multiple competing views presented. The discussion remains unresolved, with no consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on specific definitions of energy and dimensionality, which may not be universally accepted. The discussion includes references to advanced concepts that may not be fully elaborated upon, leaving some assumptions and mathematical steps unresolved.

big_bounce
Messages
102
Reaction score
3
Someones like teachers in my country says energy is vector and scalar .
Is that true ?
Anyone can prov that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Energy is a scalar. What gave you the impression it could be a vector?
 
Force is a vector, energy is a scalar. Perhaps you are confusing the two?
 
Energy is a scalar. If it were a vector then conservation of energy would fail during uniform circular motion in a radial potential and many other situations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: parshyaa
Pengwuino said:
Energy is a scalar. What gave you the impression it could be a vector?

My friends in physics discipline and some teachers in university !

I Search web and find this :

<< crackpot link deleted >>

I'm confused .

Answer2:
Yes. Energy is a scalar and a vector. Energy is a Quaternion quantity consisting of a scalar and three vectors, forming a 4D quantity.Early scientists started with scalar quantities. With Faraday's field theory (directed lines), vectors came into physics.However, the early definition of energy as scalar persisted to this day.
Vector energy is all around us, but we are blinded by dogma. F.D is called energy, but FxD is vector energy but is called Torque.I think we are about to lift the blindness. "Dark Energy" in Astronomy is vector energy. The Dark Energy is cmV = cP. Here is vector energy, Momentum energy. Momentum is a vector and Momentum energy cP is also a vector. A scalar c times a vector is a vector ! If there is vector momentum, there must be vector energy!
The correct Equation off Gravitation Energy is E = -mGM/r + mcV = -mu/r + cP.Newton did not include the vector energy cP=cmV. This was equivalent to saying the mass m, had velocity zero , E= -mu/r + mc0. Such is NOT the case. This is like saying the Earth is orbiting the sun with velocity 0, when it is moving at 30km/s. it is the vector energy cmV that provides the centrifugal force to keep the Earth from falling into the sun. It is the vector energy that is the "dark Energy" that is the anti-gravity (centrifugal) force. Vector Energy removes the mystery of "Dark Energy".
Newton's Three laws are derived from this vector energy, that Newton incorporated.Force F = XE = [d/dr, DEL] m[-u/r , cV]F = m[v2/r - cDEL.V, cdV/dr +u/r3 R + cDELxV]

At Equilibrium 0 = F and DELxV=0 meaning R and V are parallel and. It is essential that DELxV =0 for the vectors to sum to zero.The result is

0 = m[v2/r - cv/r, cdV/dr + u/r3 R ]
Equilibrium Condition exists when v/c=1 or v=c.
Newton's Equal and Parallel phrase comes form

0 = m(dV/dt + u/r3 R) comes from

0 = cdV/dr - DEL u/r

Newto added the term 'mdV/dt' a vector, before vectors, This term is the vector energy P=cmV and dcP/dr = cmdV/cdt = mdV/dt, voila!

It is time to recognize that we live in a 4D Universe and Energy is a 4D Quantity.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You've stumbled on a crackpot. Telltale phrases: "we are blinded by dogma", "we are about to lift the blindness".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: baruch60610 and crudux_cruo
That looks wrong.

While it is possible to combine momentum and energy in the (stress-)energy-momentum-tensor, "energy" (density) is a scalar component of this tensor.
 
...forming a 4D quantity...but FxD is vector energy

The cross product does not work in 4D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
4K