Is Euclid's 5th Postulate Crucial for Defining Euclidean Geometry?

  • Thread starter Thread starter radou
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Euclid's 5th postulate is essential for distinguishing Euclidean geometry from non-Euclidean geometries. It asserts that through a given point, there exists exactly one line parallel to a given line, a principle central to Euclidean geometry. In contrast, hyperbolic geometry does not adhere to this postulate, leading to different properties and structures. Elliptic geometry, often categorized as non-Euclidean, allows for multiple parallel lines through a point. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for grasping the foundations of different geometric systems.
radou
Homework Helper
Messages
3,148
Reaction score
8
Is Euclid's 5th postulate the basic thing which, if valid or not, makes a geometry Euclidean or non-Euclidean?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Fundamentally, yes. There is also the axiom (I confess I don't rember the number- it might be #2!) that asserts that there exist exactly one line between any two points. "Hyperbolic geometry", in particular, the geometry on the surface of a sphere, does not satisfy that but generally speaking, the distinction between Euclidean geometry and "elliptic geometry"- normally thought of as "non-Euclidean" geometry is the requirement that, through a given point, there exist exactly one line parallel to a given point (known as "Playfair's axiom). While elliptic geometry allows that there exist more than one axiom, hyperbolic geometry requires exist exactly one such line.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top