Is External Energy Loss Essential in Calculating Final Energy?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gunblaze
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether external energy losses, such as heat and sound, should be included in the calculation of final energy when applying the work-energy theorem. It emphasizes that work done is defined as the change in energy, specifically the difference between initial and final energy, while accounting for energy losses. The conversation clarifies that net work can be expressed as the final mechanical energy minus the initial mechanical energy and energy losses. It distinguishes between conservative and non-conservative forces, noting that only conservative forces contribute to potential energy. Ultimately, the conclusion is that all forms of resistance and energy loss must be considered for accurate calculations.
gunblaze
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
ok.. guyz, I'm not really sure on how I'm going to phrase this qn, so juz hope you guyz out there understands

work done= Change in energy
= Energy(final) - energy(initial)
For this eqn, do you have to add in external energy loss eg: heat n sound energy into your energy final..? or do you juz take account the energy change in the body?

Sry.. not very good at this
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there are losses, the net work is
Work = energy(initial) - energy(losses) - energy(final)
 
SGT said:
If there are losses, the net work is
Work = energy(initial) - energy(losses) - energy(final)

That means that energy losses shouldn't be accounted for work done rite?

 
just in case you aren't clear yet, this is what I understand from work-energy theorem:
there are many kinds of energy. consider kinetic energy. KE of any point mass of mass 'm' at an instant when its velocity is 'v' is KE=(1/2)mv^2
the outright formula for work, applicable in any case whatsoever, with sound loss, heat loss, etc. is:
Net work done = Final KE - Initial KE
remember that this is the work done by all forces, including dissipative ones. The sign of each work done MUST be taken into account. for eg. if a body of mass m is thrown up through a height h with only gravity acting, the force due to gravity=mg, and it acts downwards, but the displacement h is upwards so the work done is
W=(mg)*(-h)= -mgh
Now, there are 2 kinds of forces. CONSERVATIVE forces are those whose 'works' DO NOT depend on the path of the particle, for example gravity, a fixed charge etc. NON-CONSERVATIVE forces are those whose works DO depend on the path of the particle, for example friction. these forces generally result in heat loss, sound etc. When only conservative forces act on a body, we assign potential energies related to these forces. the total Mechanical energy (ME) of a body is the sum of its kinetic energy and its potential energies due to all the conservative forces. Then the following equation holds:
Net work done by all external forces (other than these conservative forces) = ME(final) - ME(initial)
Let the work done by friction and all the other such dissipative forces be w(nf). Let the net work done on the body due to all other forces be W. So,
W + w(nf) = ME(final) - ME(initial)
therefore, W = ME(final) - w(nf) - ME(initial)
but the work done by the dissipative forces causes a reduction (assumed to be reduction, if I took it as increase, I would simply have some changes in sign in the final formula) in ME of the body, ME(losses).
Thus, w(nf) = ME(losses)
so, the final formula is
W = ME(final) - ME(losses) - ME(initial)
as said before.
IF you wanted to find the NET work done by ALL forces other than those for which you have assigned potential energy(all, including dissipative and non-dissipative), you can write this straight:
W = ME(final) - ME(initial)
If you still don't get it, I recommend the book "Fundamentals of Physics" by Resnick, Halliday and Walker (6th ed) or "Fundamentals of Physics" by Resnick and Halliday(2nd ed).
 
All formulas must contain all resistance to the energy input.Ergo,resistance of a 'bearing' of a particular motor must be involved along with loads of that motor.
LEAVE NOTHING OUT!
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top