Is f(x) = √(5x+2) one-to-one on (-2/5, infinity)?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigplanet401
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Inverse
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the function f(x) = √(5x + 2) and whether it is one-to-one on the interval (-2/5, ∞). Participants explore the implications of the function's derivative and its behavior at specific points within the domain.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the positivity of the derivative f' and its implications for the function being one-to-one. There are questions about the behavior of the function at the point where the derivative is undefined and whether it can be concluded that f is increasing on the entire interval. The mean value theorem is referenced as a potential tool for analysis.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance regarding the continuity of the function and its implications for being one-to-one. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions related to the function's behavior at the boundary point of the interval.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of the function's behavior at x = -2/5, where the derivative is undefined, and question whether it can be assumed that f(x) does not equal zero elsewhere in the interval. There is also mention of a theorem related to increasing functions and their inverses, which adds complexity to the discussion.

bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that

[tex] f(x) = \sqrt{5x+2}[/tex]

is one-to-one.

Homework Equations



If f' >0 or f' < 0 everywhere on f's domain, f is one-to-one.

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex] f^\prime = \frac{5}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{5x +2}} = \frac{5}{2f}[/tex]

f' is positive on (-2/5, infinity) but is undefined at x = -2/5. I can therefore say that f is one-to-one on this interval, but what about the point x=-2/5? The derivative is undefined there (the left-hand limit does not exist). There might be a way to argue that f is increasing on [-2/5, infinity), but I don't know how to do so since I really don't know if f(-2/5) = 0 is the minimum value.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have shown that ##f## is monotonically increasing on ##(-2/5,\infty)##. This combined with the continuity of ##f## along ##x \in [0,\infty)## is sufficient to state that ##f## is one-to-one.

Also, you can look at the definition of one-to-one when dealing with ##x=-2/5## (since you used a theorem for all other points of existence), and recall that one-to-one functions never map distinct elements of its domain to the same element of its range.
 
joshmccraney said:
You have shown that ##f## is monotonically increasing on ##(-2/5,\infty)##. This combined with the continuity of ##f## along ##x \in [0,\infty)## is sufficient to state that ##f## is one-to-one.

Also, you can look at the definition of one-to-one when dealing with ##x=-2/5## (since you used a theorem for all other points of existence), and recall that one-to-one functions never map distinct elements of its domain to the same element of its range.

Thanks! But without doing anything else, I'm not sure I can assume f(x) will never be zero except at x=-2/5.

But after thinking a bit more, I was able to use the fact that f(a) = f(-2/5) is defined and the mean value theorem to write

f(x) - f(a) = f'(c)(x - a) where c is in (a, x). Since f'(c) > 0 when x > a, the right-hand side will be positive and so f(x) > f(a) everywhere in [a, x) (with x > a).
 
bigplanet401 said:
Thanks! But without doing anything else, I'm not sure I can assume f(x) will never be zero except at x=-2/5.

But after thinking a bit more, I was able to use the fact that f(a) = f(-2/5) is defined and the mean value theorem to write

f(x) - f(a) = f'(c)(x - a) where c is in (a, x). Since f'(c) > 0 when x > a, the right-hand side will be positive and so f(x) > f(a) everywhere in [a, x) (with x > a).
Very nice. You are in analysis, correct, hence the burden of proof?
 
joshmccraney said:
Very nice. You are in analysis, correct, hence the burden of proof?

This was a problem in my calculus textbook. There's a theorem that says increasing/decreasing functions have inverses, but I wasn't sure how to show that the function satisfied the hypothesis.
 
I see. I suppose another way to solve could have been to simply set ##f=0## and solve for ##x##. You'd then know what values of ##x## give the desired output. It seems then your theorem covers all other points.
 
Directly from the definition of "one-to-one": If f(x)= f(y) then [itex]\sqrt{5x+ 2}= \sqrt{5y+ 2}[/itex]. Show that x= y.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K