Is Fission Classified as Capture or Noncapture?

  • Thread starter Thread starter cooper7d7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Capture Fission
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of fission in the context of neutron interactions, specifically whether it should be categorized as capture or noncapture. Participants explore the implications of this classification for calculating neutron slowing probabilities in a given environment, focusing on theoretical and conceptual aspects of nuclear reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether fission should be classified as capture or noncapture when determining cross-sections for neutron interactions.
  • Another participant asserts that the fission cross-section is part of the total capture, indicating it represents a loss during the slowing down process.
  • A subsequent reply suggests that one of the fission neutrons could be considered the same as the impacting neutron, leading to confusion about the classification.
  • A later response emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between the energies of the impacting neutron and the fission neutrons, arguing that they cannot be treated as the same due to their energy differences.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the classification of fission, with some supporting the idea that it is part of capture while others question this perspective. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of this classification for neutron interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to consider the energy levels of neutrons involved in fission and the potential implications for calculations, but do not resolve the underlying assumptions or definitions related to capture and noncapture classifications.

cooper7d7
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I apologize that me first post is such a silly one.

I am trying to solve problem 1.2 in Stacey. It asks for the probability of a 1 MeV neutron slowing to thermal. I can determine the number of collisions required in the water / uranium environment. But, when I go to select the proper crosssections, I think I should just use scattering but I was wondering if fission is considered capture or noncapture?

Thanks, I really enjoy this forum...

-Will
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The fission cross-section would be considered capture, e.g. part of the total capture. It represents a loss during the slowing down process, but then it produces 2 or 3 fast neutrons.
 
Ok

Makes sense, I was just thinking that maybe one of the 2 or 3 that are released was considered the same as the impacting neutron, in which case it was not captured. But fission is treated just like n,gamma.

Thanks,

-Will
 
cooper7d7 said:
Makes sense, I was just thinking that maybe one of the 2 or 3 that are released was considered the same as the impacting neutron, in which case it was not captured..
Will,

You really can't do what you suggest of considering one of the fission neutrons as to
be the same as the impacting neutron.

Label all your neutrons with their energies. Now consider a case of "thermal fission";
that is a low energy or "thermal neutron" causes a fission; which in a thermal reactor
is the most common type of fission.

So the impacting neutron has low energy, while the 2-3 fission neutrons have high
energy. Because of the energy difference between the impacting neutron [ low energy ]
and the fission neutrons [ high energy ], you can't consider ANY of the fission
neutrons to be a "continuation" of the impacting neutron.

Dr. Gregory Greenman
Physicist
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
16K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K