Is free fall NOT the same as floating in space?

Click For Summary
Free fall and floating in space are not equivalent due to the effects of tidal forces. In a falling box, a mass released from the top experiences slightly less gravitational pull than one released from the bottom, indicating that the box is accelerating towards a mass. This distinction can be detected with sensitive instruments, revealing that the box is not truly floating free. The differences become more pronounced over time, such as when comparing experiences in a space station versus deep space. Ultimately, while the two scenarios seem similar, they are fundamentally different due to gravitational influences.
James Demers
Messages
75
Reaction score
44
For many, many years (don't ask), I've been running into the classic example of the local reference frame: the man in the box who can't tell if he's floating free in space, or falling into a gravity well.

It occurs to me that if one is in a falling box, a mass released at the top of the box will be subject to a wee bit less gravity than a mass released at the bottom of the box. A sensitive enough instrument would be able to detect a force pulling them apart. (This is nothing exotic: it's the tidal force.) Thus, the experiment would tell you that your box is not floating free, but is accelerating toward another mass. (A worrisome discovery, I would think.)

Is this just a matter of a poor choice of example, one that's persisted for about a century? Or is there something actually different between the two boxes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
James Demers said:
, a mass released at the top of the box will be subject to a wee bit less gravity than a mass released at the bottom of the box.
This is true and the same difference can be detected in the Microgravity in an orbiting space vehicle. To avoid this effect, you really would need to be "floating" at a great distance from even the Sun.
 
James Demers said:
For many, many years (don't ask), I've been running into the classic example of the local reference frame: the man in the box who can't tell if he's floating free in space, or falling into a gravity well.

It occurs to me that if one is in a falling box, a mass released at the top of the box will be subject to a wee bit less gravity than a mass released at the bottom of the box. A sensitive enough instrument would be able to detect a force pulling them apart. (This is nothing exotic: it's the tidal force.) Thus, the experiment would tell you that your box is not floating free, but is accelerating toward another mass. (A worrisome discovery, I would think.)

Is this just a matter of a poor choice of example, one that's persisted for about a century? Or is there something actually different between the two boxes?

Exactly. The two are only approximately equivalent. If your experiment lasts a sufficiently long time, you will see differences between, say, orbiting the Earth in the space station and drifting out in space somewhere.

And, obviously, someone in free fall towards the Earth may eventually collide with it!
 
  • Like
Likes m4r35n357

Similar threads

  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
7K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 66 ·
3
Replies
66
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K