Is Gene Selection and Manipulation the Key to Living 1000 Years?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Euphoriet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gene
AI Thread Summary
Gene manipulation projects are gaining attention for their potential to extend human lifespan significantly, with theories suggesting that living to 1000 years may not be far-fetched. The discussion highlights the intersection of scientific advancements in genetics and ethical considerations surrounding these technologies. Key topics include the feasibility of gene editing techniques, such as CRISPR, and their implications for health and longevity. Participants express interest in exploring credible resources and studies that delve into the science of gene manipulation and its moral ramifications, emphasizing the need for a balanced understanding of both the potential benefits and ethical dilemmas involved.
Euphoriet
Messages
105
Reaction score
0
I'm very interested in learning about gene manipulation projects and the morality of this delicate issue.

I was reading up on how it is theorized one day we could live to be 1000 and how it wasnt a very farfetched concept
If you have any links or your own input on the subject I would greatly appreciate your contribution, thanks.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Euphoriet said:
I was reading up on how it is theorized one day we could live to be 1000 and how it wasnt a very farfetched concept
Why wasn't it a farfetched concept?

And what kind of gene manipulation projects are you referring to?
 

Thread 'Chagas disease now established in US'

Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
View full post »

Thread 'I need help understanding this quote about recent Natural Selection'

I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
View full post »

Similar threads

Book Review: The Gene's-Eye View of Evolution
Replies
1
Views
2K
Medical Targeting microbial metabolites to treat autism
Replies
1
Views
2K
Is there a limit to Human Lifespans?
Replies
4
Views
5K
Epothilone B study connected to 'Hard Problem of Consciousness' Model
Replies
5
Views
2K
Causing periodic storm events on a fictional planet
Replies
9
Views
2K
No worries Vinh, it's for your own safety. :smile:What is the PhysicsForums?
Replies
2
Views
349
Looking for large dataset of non image-centric physics data
Replies
1
Views
1K
Medical Is Mind Uploading the Key to Eternal Life?
Replies
5
Views
4K
Delayed Vaccination Discussion with Laymen
Replies
5
Views
2K
Other How do I select a topic for my final-year research project in Physics BSc?
Replies
2
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top