A Is Graphene a Two-Dimensional Weyl Semimetal with Spin Degenerate Dirac Bands?

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Newstein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graphene Weyl
Newstein
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I'm recently interested in the topological/Weyl semimetals, but I'm not an expert on the theory.
Most papers just define Weyl semimetal as a material that have pairs of Weyl points with opposite Berry curvature. Here in graphene, the Berry curvature of the Dirac cones at K and K' point is also opposite. So can we call graphene as a two-dimensional Weyl semimetal?
For the Weyl semimetal candidates in literature, SOC is important, and each Weyl point is spin polarized. The Dirac bands of graphene are spin degenerate. Is the definition of Weyl semimetal also based on the SOC?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well you should first note that the Dirac points in graphene are technically gapped once you add SOC (hence the QSHE). Weyl semimetals are more robust since the Weyl points are connected by a Fermi arc and cannot be annihilated unless you bring the two together (this could also produce a Dirac semimetal though if there is some symmetry keeping the two Weyl points pinned together on a line or a point) which does not happen with SOC. Also note that in order for the Weyl points to be separated in k space, you need to break time reversal and/or inversion.

There are some examples though of systems in 2d which have Dirac points that do not gap adding SOC which are distinct from the systems I mentioned previously.

If you look on ArXiv I think there are several recent reviews on this topic.
 
radium said:
Well you should first note that the Dirac points in graphene are technically gapped once you add SOC (hence the QSHE). Weyl semimetals are more robust since the Weyl points are connected by a Fermi arc and cannot be annihilated unless you bring the two together (this could also produce a Dirac semimetal though if there is some symmetry keeping the two Weyl points pinned together on a line or a point) which does not happen with SOC. Also note that in order for the Weyl points to be separated in k space, you need to break time reversal and/or inversion.

There are some examples though of systems in 2d which have Dirac points that do not gap adding SOC which are distinct from the systems I mentioned previously.

If you look on ArXiv I think there are several recent reviews on this topic.
Thank you so much!
 
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top