Is Gravity an Attractive Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Abstruce
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Gravity
Abstruce
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Is Gravity a Force of Attraction?

We are familiar with electromagnetic attraction and we understand how and why it works.

We do not understand Gravity to my understanding and we are trying to link it and its properties with that of electromagnetic.

Now we are trying to detect Gravitational Waves.

Is it possible that Gravity is not an attraction but merely centrifical force.

Could it be that by the fact that mass follows the curvature of space that when space is bent mass that is in motion will experience centrifical force due to the bending of space?

Could this explain Gravity and how it has the same attraction for all mass?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nope. We have a good theory of gravity, that produces accurate predictions. That theory also predicts gravity waves, and the detection of these is just at the limit of our experimental ability.

In the future our understanding will be greater, but it will rise upon the shoulders of general relativity just as GR rose on the shoulders of Newton.

There is no reason at all to believe gravity is some other thing entirely.
 


The concept of gravity as an attractive force has been widely accepted and supported by scientific evidence for centuries. It is a fundamental force in the universe, responsible for the motion of planets, stars, and galaxies. While we may not fully understand the mechanisms behind gravity, its effects are consistently observed and can be accurately predicted through mathematical equations.

The idea that gravity may be a centrifugal force due to the curvature of space is an interesting theory, but it goes against the current understanding of gravity as an attractive force. In order for this theory to hold true, we would need to see a consistent relationship between the curvature of space and the amount of mass present, which has not been observed. Additionally, the idea that gravity has the same attraction for all mass is not fully explained by this theory.

The detection of gravitational waves also supports the concept of gravity as an attractive force. These waves are produced by the acceleration of massive objects, such as the collision of two black holes. This acceleration is a result of the attractive force of gravity between the objects.

In conclusion, while there may be ongoing research and theories about the nature of gravity, the current scientific understanding is that it is an attractive force that acts between all objects with mass. The concept of gravity as a centrifugal force due to the curvature of space is an interesting idea, but it does not fully explain the observed effects of gravity in our universe.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top