Is gravity repulsive at particle scales?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tipped
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity Particle
Tipped
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
A while back (several years ago), I recall reading that when two particles are placed in very close proximity to each other, gravity begins to act as a repulsive force. I began looking for that source recently, but can find no reference to it (except one source of dubious credulity). Could someone inform me whether I am recalling correctly? Or perhaps incorrectly, as I suspect?
As a side note, I do know that the state of quantum gravity is still incomplete/unknown, so any pointers to hypotheses/theories (defunct or still in debate) where what I recall is actually correct would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This doesn't sound right to me. The closest I can come is what Leonard Susskind calls the infrared-ultraviolet connection. This is the idea that you can probe shorter and shorter distance scales by using particles of higher energy and shorter wavelength, but at some point the high-energy projectile hits the target you're imaging so hard that it forms a black hole. Once you start forming black holes, the radius of the black hole actually *increases* with energy, so you aren't probing shorter distance scales anymore.
 
Cool. But I'm pretty sure that what I was reading about wasn't about things that could really be probed with light. Perhaps more theoretical?
 
I think it will be very hard to address the details without a reference. It certainly sounds like you are misremembering.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top