Is h(n) - f(n) in o(g(n)) Given f(n) in o(g(n)) and g(n) in O(H(n))?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ammoun
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complexity
ammoun
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi

When we have f(n) \in o(g(n)) and g(n) \in O(H(n))

Can I proove that h(n)-f(n) \in o(g(n))?

Obviously I don't want you to give me the answer, but some hints and maybe which definitions of O and o I should use.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, I believe I came up with a counter example:

If f(n)=n, g(n)=n^{2} and h(n)=n^{3}

When I looked for the limit of the difference / g(n) it cannot give 0.

Could you please confirm this result?

Thanks
 
ammoun said:
Hi

When we have f(n) \in o(g(n)) and g(n) \in O(H(n))

Can I proove that h(n)-f(n) \in o(g(n))?

Obviously I don't want you to give me the answer, but some hints and maybe which definitions of O and o I should use.

Thanks
What definitions are you talking about? Also how does H(n) relate to h(n). Forgive me for asking but I just don't know what you are referring to.
 
ramsey2879 said:
What definitions are you talking about? Also how does H(n) relate to h(n). Forgive me for asking but I just don't know what you are referring to.

Thank you ramsey, it was the same function h and the definitions I'm talking about are of big O of a function and small o.

For example Big O of g(n) is the set of function f(n), f(n)≤c g(n). (not complete definition)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
65
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Back
Top