Is HeadOn! Just Homeopathic Candle Wax?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rach3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Marketing
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the product "HeadOn," marketed as a headache remedy but composed primarily of homeopathic candle wax. The product's active ingredient, potassium dichromate, is present in extremely low quantities and is known to be carcinogenic. The marketing strategy relies on repetitive advertising to create brand recognition, targeting consumers who may lack scientific understanding. Despite its questionable efficacy, the product generated significant revenue, raising concerns about the pharmaceutical industry's focus on marketing over research and development. The conversation also touches on the broader implications of marketing strategies in the pharmaceutical sector, with a notable percentage of revenues already allocated to marketing efforts.
Rach3
I'm rather amused to find that the product behind "HeadOn! Apply directly to the forehead!" is actually homeopathic candle wax. For those who've never seen it, this product is a purported headache medicine, the advertisements for which are intentionally aggravating. A phrase is repeated a dozen times (like minimalist music), so as to provoke the targets and ingrain the product's image in their minds. Apparently, the target audience is the scientifically illiterate.

The "active" ingredient is potassium dichromate present only in ppm (part per million) quantities, which is very fortunate since chromium (VI) compounds are carcinogenic as well as exceedingly toxic (msds). There's also about a ppt (part per trillion) of some flower extract, as well as menthol (makes your skin cold.) The rest is inactive ingredients (mostly wax).

The best part? Miralus' scam raked in half a billion in revenue. :eek:

As noticed at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HeadOn,

confirmed by official product information at
http://www.walgreens.com/store/product.jsp?id=prod1806169 .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The real question is, how soon will the established pharamceuticals drop their expensive R&D programs and go full-time in marketing. That's where the money is.
 
:-p I thought this was for acne... but now it seems like it would cause acne. :-p
 
Rach3 said:
The real question is, how soon will the established pharamceuticals drop their expensive R&D programs and go full-time in marketing. That's where the money is.

The pharmaceutical companies are already spending 25% of their revenues on marketing. 18% goes for R&D. Intense marketing definitely works for just about anything.



http://www.retrojunk.com/details_commercial/1054/

As for the "Head On" commercial it is considered to be an inovation in modern? advertising.

viagra anyone?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'
I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
Back
Top