Is Inertia Caused by an Object's Mass and Gravitational Force?

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 609718
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia
AI Thread Summary
Inertia is not caused by an object's mass or its self-exerted gravitational force, as these internal forces do not influence the ease of movement. The term "inert" derives from Latin, meaning "no go," and is unrelated to the concept of mass. Inertia is fundamentally about the observation that objects remain at rest or in uniform motion unless acted upon by an external force. The origins of the concept of inertia predate scientific definitions of mass, highlighting its observational nature. The underlying reasons for inertia may remain unanswerable, emphasizing its status as a fundamental principle of physics.
member 609718
Is it because the mass of a given object exerts a gravitational force upon itself?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
davidbrown said:
Is it because the mass of a given object exerts a gravitational force upon itself?
Any force of an object on itself (like your left hand pushing on your right) has no effect on how easy it is to move the object.
 
Again, "inert" is Latin. It means "no go". There is no connection to the word "mas"
 
The concept of inertia existed as in 'things don't move unless something makes them move', before any scientific idea of mass.
That is a matter of observation of fact; 'why are things like that?' is probably not answerable.
 

Thread 'Average velocity as a weighted mean'

Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
View full post »

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

I Cavendish balance and mass of objects
Replies
6
Views
1K
B Why Is an Object's Weight Equal to the Force of Gravity It Experiences?
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
Why does mass/energy have inertia?
Replies
22
Views
3K
Is inertia the total gravitational forces of the Universe?
Replies
6
Views
2K
About acceleration and mass....
Replies
5
Views
1K
The Effects of Incredibly Small Inertia on Acceleration: A Scientific Inquiry
Replies
11
Views
1K
What is the source of inertia?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Calculating Mass Inertia Product - Examples 1 & 2
Replies
2
Views
2K
B Does Pushing a Ship from a Ramp Affect Its Movement?
Replies
15
Views
1K
I Moment of Inertia about an axis and Torque about a point
Replies
5
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top