B Is Infinity x 0 Equal to Zero?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Zero
Kiki
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
What is infinity times zero? Isn't it zero? I mean, infinity times zero is the same as zero an infinite amount of times, and adding zero infinitely would give zero because even though zero is always being added, this process is the same as nothing ever being added to zero.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Kiki said:
What is infinity times zero? Isn't it zero?

Simple rules of arithmetic don't apply to infinity, and as such ## \infty \times 0## doesn't mean anything. It's indeterminate.

Kiki said:
I mean, infinity times zero is the same as zero an infinite amount of times, and adding zero infinitely would give zero because even though zero is always being added, this process is the same as nothing ever being added to zero.

That leads to all kinds of confusing arguments, what then is ##.0000000000000000000001 \times \infty##? What about ##
\lim_{x \to \infty} (x \times 1/x)##, why is that one in this case?
 
Adding something that is finite an infinite amount of times would not lead to a finite value, it would lead to an infinite value, so maybe that is the answer to the your first question.

The second question is about limits (which I could use help with), but x/x = 1, so maybe there is no need to consider the variable x as it goes to infinity, so there is no need to consider a limit.
 
Kiki said:
Adding something that is finite an infinite amount of times would not lead to a finite value, it would lead to an infinite value, so maybe that is the answer to the your first question.

You're still thinking about infinity as an actual amount, it doesn't belong to any of the numbers in which arithmetic depend on. It's a concept. What infinity are we multiplying it by? Is there a difference between the infinity between 3 and 4? or 3.1 and 3.2? Both contain an infinite amount of numbers between them. Would you still reach the same conclusions?

Kiki said:
The second question is about limits (which I could use help with), but x/x = 1, so maybe there is no need to consider the variable x as it goes to infinity, so there is no need to consider a limit.

I used limit terms since I assumed that's where you confusion arose. I know I thought similar things back when I started learning limits. ##\lim_{x \to \infty} (x) = \infty##, ##\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{x}= 0 ##, ## \lim_{x \to \infty} (x \times \frac{1}{x}) = 0 \times \infty = 1## In this case ##0 \times \infty = 1## which is a contradiction to the statement above.
 
  • Like
Likes Logical Dog
Kiki said:
Adding something that is finite an infinite amount of times would not lead to a finite value, it would lead to an infinite value, so maybe that is the answer to the your first question.
No, this isn't true. Consider ##\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac 1 {2^n} = 1 + \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 4 + \frac 1 8 + \dots + \frac 1 {2^n} + \dots##. Here we're adding an infinite number of terms, all of which are finite, and it can be shown that these all add up to 2.
Kiki said:
The second question is about limits (which I could use help with), but x/x = 1, so maybe there is no need to consider the variable x as it goes to infinity, so there is no need to consider a limit.
What about ##\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{n - 1}{n + 1}##? It can be shown that this limit is 1, even though ##\frac{n - 1}{n + 1}## is always less than 1 for any finite value of n.
 
  • Like
Likes Student100
Kiki said:
What is infinity times zero? Isn't it zero? I mean, infinity times zero is the same as zero an infinite amount of times, and adding zero infinitely would give zero because even though zero is always being added, this process is the same as nothing ever being added to zero.

Multiplication is a process involving numbers. Infinity is not a number, so cannot be used in multiplication.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top