B Is Infinity x 0 Equal to Zero?

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiki
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Infinity Zero
AI Thread Summary
Infinity times zero is considered an indeterminate form, as basic arithmetic rules do not apply to infinity. The discussion highlights that while one might argue that adding zero infinitely results in zero, this reasoning fails to account for the nature of infinity as a concept rather than a number. The conversation also touches on limits, illustrating that expressions involving infinity can lead to different outcomes depending on the context, such as limits approaching 1 or 0. Ultimately, multiplication involving infinity is problematic because infinity is not a number and cannot be treated as such in arithmetic operations. The conclusion is that infinity times zero does not yield a definitive answer.
Kiki
Messages
21
Reaction score
1
What is infinity times zero? Isn't it zero? I mean, infinity times zero is the same as zero an infinite amount of times, and adding zero infinitely would give zero because even though zero is always being added, this process is the same as nothing ever being added to zero.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Kiki said:
What is infinity times zero? Isn't it zero?

Simple rules of arithmetic don't apply to infinity, and as such ## \infty \times 0## doesn't mean anything. It's indeterminate.

Kiki said:
I mean, infinity times zero is the same as zero an infinite amount of times, and adding zero infinitely would give zero because even though zero is always being added, this process is the same as nothing ever being added to zero.

That leads to all kinds of confusing arguments, what then is ##.0000000000000000000001 \times \infty##? What about ##
\lim_{x \to \infty} (x \times 1/x)##, why is that one in this case?
 
Adding something that is finite an infinite amount of times would not lead to a finite value, it would lead to an infinite value, so maybe that is the answer to the your first question.

The second question is about limits (which I could use help with), but x/x = 1, so maybe there is no need to consider the variable x as it goes to infinity, so there is no need to consider a limit.
 
Kiki said:
Adding something that is finite an infinite amount of times would not lead to a finite value, it would lead to an infinite value, so maybe that is the answer to the your first question.

You're still thinking about infinity as an actual amount, it doesn't belong to any of the numbers in which arithmetic depend on. It's a concept. What infinity are we multiplying it by? Is there a difference between the infinity between 3 and 4? or 3.1 and 3.2? Both contain an infinite amount of numbers between them. Would you still reach the same conclusions?

Kiki said:
The second question is about limits (which I could use help with), but x/x = 1, so maybe there is no need to consider the variable x as it goes to infinity, so there is no need to consider a limit.

I used limit terms since I assumed that's where you confusion arose. I know I thought similar things back when I started learning limits. ##\lim_{x \to \infty} (x) = \infty##, ##\lim_{x \to \infty} \frac{1}{x}= 0 ##, ## \lim_{x \to \infty} (x \times \frac{1}{x}) = 0 \times \infty = 1## In this case ##0 \times \infty = 1## which is a contradiction to the statement above.
 
  • Like
Likes Logical Dog
Kiki said:
Adding something that is finite an infinite amount of times would not lead to a finite value, it would lead to an infinite value, so maybe that is the answer to the your first question.
No, this isn't true. Consider ##\sum_{n = 0}^{\infty}\frac 1 {2^n} = 1 + \frac 1 2 + \frac 1 4 + \frac 1 8 + \dots + \frac 1 {2^n} + \dots##. Here we're adding an infinite number of terms, all of which are finite, and it can be shown that these all add up to 2.
Kiki said:
The second question is about limits (which I could use help with), but x/x = 1, so maybe there is no need to consider the variable x as it goes to infinity, so there is no need to consider a limit.
What about ##\lim_{n \to \infty}\frac{n - 1}{n + 1}##? It can be shown that this limit is 1, even though ##\frac{n - 1}{n + 1}## is always less than 1 for any finite value of n.
 
  • Like
Likes Student100
Kiki said:
What is infinity times zero? Isn't it zero? I mean, infinity times zero is the same as zero an infinite amount of times, and adding zero infinitely would give zero because even though zero is always being added, this process is the same as nothing ever being added to zero.

Multiplication is a process involving numbers. Infinity is not a number, so cannot be used in multiplication.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top