Is information conserved in quantum physics?

Gerinski
Messages
322
Reaction score
15
Leonard Susskind says so. But I don't see it.

Yes, the present "here and now" is computed by nature from the events lying in its past light cone + the laws of nature. If we assume a deterministic universe, the present "here and now" contains the information from the events in its past light cone.

But when we introduce quantum randomness and uncertainty, we can not say that anymore. The present "here and now" is computed by the events in its past light cone + the laws of nature, + an element of uncertainty or randomness. The "here and now" can never tell us precisely what the past events were like, because it may have been defined by a random quantum "jump" altering what classical theory would have predicted.

So, in which way can we say that information is conserved when we include quantum mechanics? Surely Susskind is much more clever than I am so I must be wrong in something.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have touched on one of the great mysteries. Quantum physics describes a precise way to determine the future quantum state. This might tell us in the future that there is an exact probability for each outcome. Information is conserved in the sense that quantum state (that tells us the probabilities) can be advanced forward and backward in time to tell us the probabilities at any other time.

However once something actually happens1 then the probability for it becomes 1 and the probability for all other outcomes becomes 0. This can imply a loss of information. We explain this by the existence of some element outside the system which has interacted with it.

So with conventional thinking at least, we would conclude that something special seems to happen at the end of the experiment. This quandary is sometimes called the measurement problem or wave-function collapse. This issue has not been fully resolved.

1 perhaps a problematic notion in light of quantum physics
 
But when a measurement is made, the future is different, so maybe that new future encodes the new information?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top