B Is Infrared Light Invisible to Humans Due to Eye Limitations?

AI Thread Summary
Infrared light is invisible to humans because our retinas contain cone cells that are sensitive only to a limited range of wavelengths, specifically not extending into the infrared spectrum beyond 750nm. The light from the sun encompasses a broad spectrum of wavelengths, but human vision is restricted to a small portion of that spectrum, primarily in the visible range. Different animals can perceive other parts of the spectrum due to variations in the proteins present in their eyes. This limitation in human vision is a result of evolutionary adaptations. Understanding these concepts enhances knowledge of both physics and biology.
gehrenfeld
Messages
2
Reaction score
2
I am 74yo and love Physics.
If my basic knowledge of physics is correct, light is a photon.

My question is:
1. Is the reason we cannot see infrared light because the spectrum travels at a wave link our eyes cannot see?
2. Does the light from the sun have all the different waves combined, and we only see one frequency, or are all the waves separate?

I hope my question made sense.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
Thank you.
I learned a great deal from those articles.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970 and Dale
More specifically, the reason we can't see infrared is because our retinas have cone cells with proteins that are sensitive to a small range of the spectrum, and they are not stimulated by light in the IR range. (off the right side of the graph - wavelengths > 750nm):

1650229552276.png

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Color_vision

This explains why some animals can see in other parts of the spectrum - they have different proteins.
 
  • Like
Likes InkTide, vanhees71, PeroK and 1 other person
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Back
Top