Is intercalation and deintercalation physics?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Padford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
Intercalation and deintercalation are processes often discussed in the context of materials science and chemistry, but their underlying principles are rooted in physics. The discussion highlights a conflict between the disciplines, as some argue that these processes should be considered within physics due to their fundamental nature. A quote from Ernest Rutherford emphasizes the primacy of physics in scientific inquiry, suggesting that chemistry may be secondary. However, the conversation also points out the need for clarity on academic guidelines regarding the inclusion of chemistry in physics coursework. Ultimately, the relationship between intercalation, deintercalation, and physics remains a nuanced topic that warrants further exploration.
Padford
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
is intercalation and deintercalation physics?
doing CWK for physics, and have been TOLD not to do chemistry, is it physics?
Many thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Padford said:
is intercalation and deintercalation physics?
doing CWK for physics, and have been TOLD not to do chemistry, is it physics?
Many thanks in advance
In science there is only physics; everything else is stamp collecting." Ernest Rutherford (winner of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry)

AM
 
But it's not Ernest Rutherford you have to argue with!

Ask whoever it was who told you you can't do chemistry!
 
Andrew Mason said:
In science there is only physics; everything else is stamp collecting." Ernest Rutherford (winner of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry)

AM


Great quote!
 
awesome quote
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top