Is it a misprint in QFT book of Peskin?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on a potential misprint in the Quantum Field Theory (QFT) book by Peskin and Schroeder, specifically regarding the formula presented on page 252 in section 7.5 concerning the renormalization of electric charge. The formula states that \((e^{2}-e^{2}_{0})/e^{2}_{0}=\deltaZ_{3}\approx-2\alpha/3\pi\epsilon\), where \(\epsilon\) represents the dimensionality of spacetime. Despite initial concerns about the validity of this formula, it has been confirmed that there is no misprint in the errata. The confusion arises from the interpretation of the terms involved, particularly the relationship between the bare charge and the observed charge.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
  • Familiarity with renormalization concepts
  • Knowledge of electric charge and its representation in theoretical physics
  • Basic grasp of dimensional regularization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of renormalization in Quantum Field Theory
  • Study the implications of dimensional regularization in particle physics
  • Examine the derivation of the formula for charge renormalization in QFT
  • Investigate the significance of the fine-structure constant \(\alpha\) in quantum electrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students studying Quantum Field Theory, and researchers focusing on particle physics and renormalization techniques.

ndung200790
Messages
519
Reaction score
0
In QFT book of Peskin&Schroeder writing(page 252,section 7.5Renormalization of electric Charge):
(e^{2}-e^{2}_{0})/e^{2}_{0}=\deltaZ_{3}\approx-2\alpha/3\pi\epsilon.

Where \epsilon is 4-d(d is dim of space-time)

But I think that it is misprint,because bare charge>> observed charge e,then the right formula would be (e^{2}-e^{2}_{0})/e^{2}=...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have found out the errata and that is not misprint.Then I do not understand the formula,because (e^2-e0^2) is the same order with e0^2 then (e^2-e0^2)/e0^2 can not be divergent as Peskin(~2*anpha/3*pi*epsilon)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K