Is it harmful to learn too much trivia?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dratsab
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the potential interference caused by acquiring a broad range of knowledge versus deep specialization. Concerns are raised about whether learning a little about many subjects could lead to confusion and difficulty in retaining information. One participant reflects on their lifelong reading habit, noting that a wide array of knowledge can foster creativity by allowing for the combination of ideas. However, they caution that superficial engagement with information, such as quickly reading articles without reflection, may hinder long-term retention. The conversation also touches on the challenge of remembering similar concepts, suggesting that interference can occur when trying to distinguish between related terms. Overall, the dialogue explores the balance between breadth and depth in learning and its impact on memory and creativity.
dratsab
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
Not so much in the fact that you are wasting time, but does it cause too much interference? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_theory) For example, if I pick up a little knowledge about everything, will I ultimately jumble it all up, and end up struggling to remember anything (or at least a good deal of) what I have been learning? This kind of bothers me if it's true. I thought I remembered reading in a psychology book that interacting with different subjects caused the brain to expand in networks, and thus learning more and more would capitalize on it's potential, but this theory seems to be just the opposite. Your thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dratsab said:
Not so much in the fact that you are wasting time, but does it cause too much interference? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interference_theory) For example, if I pick up a little knowledge about everything, will I ultimately jumble it all up, and end up struggling to remember anything (or at least a good deal of) what I have been learning? This kind of bothers me if it's true. I thought I remembered reading in a psychology book that interacting with different subjects caused the brain to expand in networks, and thus learning more and more would capitalize on it's potential, but this theory seems to be just the opposite. Your thoughts?

Well I can tell you that I've read just about anything I got into my hands since I could read (age 4, my mother taught me because I wanted to learn stuff on my own), and when I was that little kid I even read the refrigerator manual. This habit I've never lost, and until today I can remember most stuff I read (not into perfect detail, but if I could do that I'd probably be a savant). On the contrary even - if you have a wide area of "trivia" knowledge (what's trivia anyway? My level of knowledge about contemporary pop culture is maybe on the 1998 level. I would consider "trivia" to know at least some important basic about any important field of knowledge), and deep knowledge of your area, you can combine it to new ideas. That's what's creativity made of.

However if you read a wikipedia article somewhat quickly, don't think about it, and do this all day long, I can imagine that you won't keep any knowledge due to lack of repetition.
 
I used to know the answer to this question, but I can't recall it just now.
 
Hmm, thanks for the input, SamirS, and for the comedy, Jimmy, hoho. The only thing I have noticed is trying to memorize words that sound similar. For example, when I was younger, anagram, acronym, and antonym were easy to jumble up. Antonym was easy to distinguish because it rhymes with synonym, but the others I had to think about for a bit. I think this could be the case with remembering similar concepts.
 
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
482
Replies
18
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
25
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
406
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Back
Top