Is it illegal to reproduce someone circuit schematic in your paper ?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the legality of reproducing a circuit schematic from a 17-year-old paper for academic purposes. Participants emphasize that copyright laws vary by country and that reproducing a diagram with proper citation may fall under fair use in the U.S. It is established that creating an original drawing of the circuit while citing the source is permissible, whereas photocopying the original diagram without permission could lead to legal issues. The consensus is that contacting the original author for permission is advisable, but not strictly necessary if the work is transformed and properly credited.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of copyright laws, particularly in academic contexts
  • Familiarity with fair use doctrine in the United States
  • Proficiency in using Multisim for circuit design
  • Knowledge of academic citation practices
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the specifics of copyright law in your country
  • Learn about fair use and its applications in academic writing
  • Explore best practices for citing sources in academic papers
  • Investigate how to transform existing works to comply with copyright regulations
USEFUL FOR

Academics, researchers, and students involved in engineering or technical writing who need to understand copyright implications when using existing works in their papers.

patric44
Messages
308
Reaction score
40
hi guys
i am trying to write a paper based on someone previous paper in which he discussed a simple electric circuit on some topic , my question is : is it illegal for me to reproduce the circuit schematic using multisim or something and properly cite them in my paper ?
or i need their permeation for that , and what if the paper is 17 years old .
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
patric44 said:
i am trying to write a paper based on someone previous paper in which he discussed a simple electric circuit on some topic
How simple? Is it simple enough that it is shown in other references (like databooks, application notes, textbooks)? What was that 17 year old publication about? Was it copyrighted? Does it look like the author is still around so that you could ping them with an e-mail asking for permission?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo, hmmm27 and jedishrfu
IANAL but just to make sure we are talking about the same thing: definitely if you quote the source and draw the circuit by yourself it is a completely different situation than if you just reproduce the diagram by photocopying it this or other way.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: patric44
Reproducing an excerpt of a copyrighted work and citing the source in order to comment on it usually falls within fair use in the US

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_use

if that is what you are doing, just go for it. The copyright holder can object, but can only sue for damages if they can prove you profited from misappropriating their work.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: patric44 and DaveE
Also not a lawyer, but the copyright typically covers the literal images and words, but does not cover ideas (not copyrightable, but patentable if that's appropriate). So if you just draw the circuit yourself and don't give them credit I think you're not committing a federal crime (though you are committing an academic one)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: patric44
Mentor Note -- we are getting close to giving legal advice in some of these responses, and I'm pretty sure none of us are IP lawyers...

@patric44 -- Please respond to my questions in Post #3. Thank you.
 
Illegal where? Copyright laws depend on the country.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Evo
berkeman said:
How simple? Is it simple enough that it is shown in other references (like databooks, application notes, textbooks)? What was that 17 year old publication about? Was it copyrighted? Does it look like the author is still around so that you could ping them with an e-mail asking for permission?
the original author constructed a circuit that might be used for educational purposes to demonstrate some physical concept , the auther derived some differential equations related to it , my paper are based on a numerical solution of the differential equations deduced from their paper , so basically i am citing them very much every where in the my paper, i don't know if it was copyrighted or not , but i am assuming that it might not be since their original paper urge the use of such circuits to demonstrate the physical concept , i redrawed the circuit in my paper using multisim , referring that its their circuit and continued my discussion from that
 
  • #10
What are you going to use your paper for? If it's to be published in a journal the journal will probably know the rules.
 
  • #11
Would people that sue others for citing their work last long in academia?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K