News Is it immoral to sell kids on the military?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kids Military
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the morality of promoting military service to children, with strong opinions on both sides. One viewpoint argues that military recruitment advertisements glamorize service while ignoring the potential for mental health issues, alcoholism, and the harsh realities of combat. Conversely, others defend military service as a respectable career that offers education and personal growth, countering claims of brainwashing and desensitization to violence. The debate also touches on the impact of current military actions, particularly in Iraq, and whether these align with American values. Ultimately, the conversation reveals deep divisions in perspectives on military service and its implications for youth.
  • #51
Pengwuino said:
What a cop out. If I point to any speech, you'll say its political gain and of course, closed door talks with parents don't exactly get recorded. Why waste my time with such ideological brainwashing...
It's not a copout. Would you like me to find some discussions between him and parents?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
pattylou said:
I think this is the basis of our disagreement.
I am speaking as a parent. You are speaking as an adult who would/did serve in the military.
I am talking about the "rightness" of me *saying* to my daughters "Joining the military is a good thing." Such a statement would be wrong for me to make. Me advising my kids to join the military is *not* a good thing, because our military's actions are serving primarily to create cost and loss for us in every area.

No parent wants to lose their kids for any reason the least of which is war. Therefore, I couldn't blame someone for not wanting their kids to join the military for that reason. However, there are people’s kids that are going to go over there and will die regardless of whether or not your kids join the military.

The fact of the matter is that it is much harder for the men and women, many of whom are but kids, in Iraq to do their jobs if they do not have the manpower they need to get the job done. There is a chance that if more soldiers were available, there would be fewer US casualties...

That is the reason that I believe we need to set politics aside on this issue...it is not about supporting the war. It is about supporting your fellow American who is likely in Iraq by duress.
 
  • #53
Wow, this thread got off-topic pretty quickly.

In reading the opening post, I'd say it's wrong to sell them on the military using the reasons given...travel the world, get an education...

If someone enlists for those reasons, and not out of a sense of duty to their country, or desire to protect the country, then they are being misled regarding that enlistment. You don't need to enlist in the military to see the world or get an education. I think it's actually dangerous to the military and other enlistees to have people joining for the wrong reasons. They're not signing up for a Club Med vacation, and will have a lot of trouble adjusting if that's what they are expecting.
 
  • #54
Moonbear said:
If someone enlists for those reasons, and not out of a sense of duty to their country, or desire to protect the country, then they are being misled regarding that enlistment. You don't need to enlist in the military to see the world or get an education. I think it's actually dangerous to the military and other enlistees to have people joining for the wrong reasons. They're not signing up for a Club Med vacation, and will have a lot of trouble adjusting if that's what they are expecting.

That much I would agree with...

I do wish the recruiters were straight with kids instead of feeding them the crap they do.
 
  • #55
pattylou said:
I'm sorry you feel that way. I feel otherwise.


I'm sorry for saying that and I don't really mean it. It's just that this issue is somewhat personal for me as you can imagine. I still value your opinion as a fellow American and I value your opinion as a person as well.

Regards
 
  • #56
I don't approve of military advertizement to kids in public schools, or to people under 21 for that matter. I'm aloud to die for my country but not die of alcohol poisoning?
 
  • #57
Entropy said:
I don't approve of military advertizement to kids in public schools, or to people under 21 for that matter. I'm aloud to die for my country but not die of alcohol poisoning?

At one time drinking was allowed on base by all military persons who were 18 and older. I also think that if your old enough to die in combat you should be old enough to drink alcohol.
 
  • #58
Townsend said:
I'm sorry for saying that and I don't really mean it. It's just that this issue is somewhat personal for me as you can imagine. I still value your opinion as a fellow American and I value your opinion as a person as well.
Regards
Thank you Townsend.

I respect your choice. I live near Port Hueneme and Pt. Mugu and so we have a good number of military around here. Some wives were in my Micro class (trying to get into the nursing program, etc). Dear Husband is a fighter jet fanatic (loves thiunderbirds, blue angels, etc, and flies Falcon virtual missions every thursday with a world-wide squadron.) (I know, that kind of stuff doesn't count, but at least it shows you that we don't sit around singing Kumbaya all day.)

Father in law worked at Boeing and Honeywell way back when, and both dad and step-dad were in WWII. My great aunt died in the flu pandemic as she treated WWI soldiers overseas.

It's part of man's history, and there's a brotherhood in military service. I understand about giving your life and standing up for your brother. I'd give my life for something I believe in.

I can't *kill* for something I believe in. (At least I hope I can't.) I believe we're *all* brothers. This is probably one area you and I disagree.

I don't think you can separate politics out of it, but I don't mean to give the impression that there is no other motivation for signing on, and I apologize if it came across that way.

Yours,
Patty
 
  • #59
pattylou said:
I think this is the basis of our disagreement.
I am speaking as a parent. You are speaking as an adult who would/did serve in the military.
I am talking about the "rightness" of me *saying* to my daughters "Joining the military is a good thing." Such a statement would be wrong for me to make. Me advising my kids to join the military is *not* a good thing, because our military's actions are serving primarily to create cost and loss for us in every area.
But, this is entirely different from my daughters coming to their own decision (at adulthood) about what is right and wrong in this regard. If they expressed deep convictions about the rightness of joining the military I would support them in that decision.
The original post was *not* "Is it wrong for kids to join the military?" Rather, the original post was "Is it immoral to *sell* kids on the military?"
It's two different questions. I realize you don't have children, and further that you have not buried any. I expect you recognize that your role as father will be different than your role as independent adult.
(Thank you for answering my questions.)
I can understand that completely. I spent 20 years in the Air Force and I'd do it again.

I'm a little less enthusiastic when one of boys starts talking about joining the Army and not that excited about one of my nephews being in Iraq. When my daughter mentioned she was thinking about getting out of the National Guard because she was pregnant, I said I thought that was a pretty good idea.

It doesn't mean joining the military is the wrong decision. It's probably closer to being rational than my idea about little kids that aren't so little anymore.
 
  • #60
Who was it that said that the military should not be "sold" to people in schools? What the hell is this BS! I am a junior in HS and they are there. They stand there with fliers. WoW! talk about bad people. Why should everybody not be informed about all of their options. And the military is an option for many people.

P.S. Townsend, I believe the drinking age should be 18 for the same reason.
 
  • #61
Moonbear said:
If someone enlists for those reasons, and not out of a sense of duty to their country, or desire to protect the country, then they are being misled regarding that enlistment. .

That is my objection. People should understand that the military is for defense [or offense under this administration] and not self improvement. It's a terrible job that somebody has to do, but we would all be better off if no one ever served in any military. It should be sold as nothing more.
 
Last edited:
  • #62
At least we don't have a draft ;)
 
  • #63
Ivan Seeking said:
That is my objection. People should understand that the military is for defense [or offense under this administration] and not self improvement. It's a terrible job that somebody has to do, but we would all be better off if no one ever served in any military. It should be sold as nothing more.
I can understand that... and I would even agree that we need to be honest with people who are joining the military. Something that is clearly not being done.

But that is a whole lot different than
Ivan Seeking said:
I see commercial after commercial about how the military will do this or that or the other thing for a person - provide education, skills, travel, teach you to look a man in the eye and shake hands firmly, - and I have seen the results - mental problems, alcoholism, a lack of respect for life, cult style brainwashing [patriotism], not to mention four years of utter boredom by most accounts. Oh yes, and then there's the flag draped coffins.

And you have to keep in mind that times do change even with the military. Today’s military has made a lot of improvements on a whole host of quality of life issues. Better gyms, more accessible off duty education and practically a paradigm shift in core values. Things like hazing and sexual harassment is taken very seriously.

If you take a look at what today’s military is all about you might be surprised at what you find out.

By the time I separated I almost didn't want to leave...and it wasn't just because I had picked up rank so don't assume that's it.
 
Last edited:
  • #64
The point in part is this: If you want an education, go to school. If you want to travel, travel. If you want a skill, go to a trade school. If you want to offer your life, or possibly end up crippled, blind, in therapy for life, or like one guy that I met that introduced himself every five minutes, all for what the present administration claims is the defense of the nation, fine, but realize that you are doing no less and for no other reason. The rest is fluff and bull. And most people that I've known do not come out of the military with marketable skills. In fact I found a couple of X Navy Nukes sitting next to me in my physics classes. They were no more marketable than I was.
 
  • #65
moose said:
At least we don't have a draft ;)

In fairness to the soldiers serving in Iraq, we should. How many thousands and thousands of promises - release dates - has Rummy broke in order to support the demand for the war.
 
  • #66
That's one of the better arguments I've heard in favor of draft.
 
  • #67
There should not be a draft! That is ridiculous! A draft would only increase deaths, ( due to rushed training), and a give people a very good reason to complain.
 
  • #68
Cosmo16 said:
There should not be a draft! That is ridiculous! A draft would only increase deaths, ( due to rushed training), and a give people a very good reason to complain.
There would be no need to rush their training.

People already have good reasons to complain.

A draft would make the sacrifice for an ill-conceived war be borne by the rich as well as the poor. Kill off a couple of rich white kids in Iraq and then see how much support for the war declines.
 
  • #69
Skyhunter said:
There would be no need to rush their training.
People already have good reasons to complain.
A draft would make the sacrifice for an ill-conceived war be borne by the rich as well as the poor. Kill off a couple of rich white kids in Iraq and then see how much support for the war declines.
I don't think it would help. The laws will end up have huge loopholes that only require money to get through.

I Have 3 sons in the prime military age (23 - 27) none of them have found it necessary to join. All have managed to complete educations and even find employment in or very close to their chosen fields.

On the other hand, I was 19 in 1969 and had completed my first year of college with a 2.0gpa (yep, I managed to pull it up to that in the final term!) I was out of money and Uncle Sam was drafting anybody that was not in school. My older brother's grades slipped and he had been drafted out of his Junior year at the local university the previous winter.

I had no desire to camp in the jungle or to be shot at by anybody, so in order to have some control over my destiny I enlisted in the US Navy. My hope was to do some traveling and some partying, then after 4yrs I would have the GI Bill to see me through college.

Once in I discovered that what was considered some of the worst possible duty was air craft carriers on the east coast. I volunteered for it... They gave it to me. So after Electronics school in Chicago, I spend over 3 yrs in Caribbean and Mediterranean seas. I achieved my selfish goal of travel in a manner far exceeding any realistic dreams.

Perhaps the biggest payoff of my 4 years service was the electronics training. It has been the core of my employability for the last 30yrs, which has seen only 2 periods of unemployment (4 months each).

Personally I did not care for the military lifestyle. I simply do not have the right outlook on life to do well there. I did my time and I got out. And yes I did complete my first college degree using the GI Bill, I believe that I used every cent available to me.

So I got everything I wanted from the Navy plus something that I did not plan on, a career.

Still in this day and age I am glad that none of my sons have had to follow that path.

If private industry can make job pitches in schools why can't the government? If you are not interested in joining the military, don't. But don't force your choices on your neighbor. For some people that is a good path for others not. But do not block a path just because it is not suitable for you.
 
Last edited:
  • #70
Integral said:
I don't think it would help. The laws will end up have huge loopholes that only require money to get through.
I agree, the rich and powerful will get to go to the "champagne units".
However, with enhanced communication, a la the internet, it will be harder to cheat with anonymity, like they did in the 60's and 70's. But hey, Bush got away with it, and he only suffered a little bit politically.

I guess that is the benefit of being "born again", all your past sins are washed away. Everyone forgives and forgets about your draft dodging drug using past.

I believe there is true repentance, but it should be accompanied by real penance. Bush in his arrogance is the epitome of someone who used religion to absolve them-self of past trespasses.

What is he going to do for the present ones?

If your born again, do you go to hell twice?

Sorry, just an off topic rant.:redface:

A draft today would make the Iraq war "less convenient". The war does not effect enough peoples lives. Not enough Americans share the sacrifice. Why, we even got a tax cut.:rolleyes:
 
  • #71
Perhaps those saying we should have a draft because we need more soldiers over there to either alleviate the burden on our current soldiers or make the war directly affect more Americans should enlist and help out - unless, of course, you are too old. I suspect that with all the health problems I've had recently, I probably wouldn't even pass a physical, but even if I could, I wouldn't be enlisting.
 
  • #72
loseyourname said:
Perhaps those saying we should have a draft because we need more soldiers over there to either alleviate the burden on our current soldiers or make the war directly affect more Americans should enlist and help out - unless, of course, you are too old. I suspect that with all the health problems I've had recently, I probably wouldn't even pass a physical, but even if I could, I wouldn't be enlisting.
I think that anyone who supports the war should volunteer. Then we won't need a draft.

None of the people making the decisions have combat experience, and most don't even have military experience.

It is easy to have a war when it is not personal.
 
  • #73
Integral said:
So I got everything I wanted from the Navy plus something that I did not plan on, a career.

Of course, IIRC, you barely missed going to Vietnam.
 
  • #74
Pengwuino said:
Although the title is highly decieving, i get what you're saying. Oddly enough my nephew is a marine reservist and let's see..

Mental problems? No.
Alcoholism? No (but then again he drank before even considering the military)
Lack of respect for life? No (and of course that's just your personal opinion)
Brainwashing? Dream on.
Four years of utter boredom? Well he's been pretty bored so far. Oddly enough, he can't wait to go to Iraq but they have been delaying their call-up for i think 18 months or so already.
Flag draped coffins? It's a military, people die, want us to disband it and go back to the stone age?

Whats with all the uninformed ideological rants lately.
And not just people die, they die to preserve America's freedoms and what it stands for, which are freedoms! The same for all nations that have a military. They fight so you can be able to say that they have mental problems, so you can say how much they waste their life. I have some friends as well that can't wait to get back to Iraq. Some of them are happy as clams doing that.

[edited out by myself]
And like Integral's account of his experience in the US Navy, you can get something out of it.

Also Ivan mentioned that people in the military have no respect for life. Have you ever been shot enough times to have almost died? Well, one is good enough for me to get the point. Have you seen a friend perish in a firey explosion? If something like that happened to you, would you not give a sh*t about living? Or would you appreciate life more, give more than you take? Carpe diem? Live like you were dying perhaps?

cult style brainwashing [patriotism]
You just compared patriotism, the love for your country, to cult brainwashing. Love and brainwashing don't mean the same-thing no matter how much you twist it. I wonder if you've ever stayed extended periods of time outside. Have you visited a "third-world" village? A second-world (if there is such a term)? You need a reality check, perhaps love your rich and prosperous life more.

pattylou said:
I'd start with the fact that he never refers to fallen sons by name, to their parents.
:smile: :smile: He's too busy to learn every person's name!

I see no honor in joining the military at present, (although I hold my father's service in the highest regard.
What would your father think if he were alive now about you thinking there is no honor in the military?

The invasion of Iraq isn't, wasn't, and never will be [justified].
This has not been proven as fact, and is only your opinion. You should not hold your opinion as fact.

Skyhunter said:
I think that anyone who supports the war should volunteer. Then we won't need a draft.
:confused: There is no draft, it is all voluntary. :rolleyes:
None of the people making the decisions have combat experience, and most don't even have military experience.
It is easy to have a war when it is not personal.
Sorry maybe I misread, but there is a ranking system, you start out at the bottom and move to the top. And you would rather have everyone go into combat than stay out of Iraq's business?

o:) :zzz: I still wish you long days, pleasent nights,

Mk
 
Last edited:
  • #75
the difference between advertising for a regular job and for joining the military is the hazards and stresses involved. i can't think of any more hazardous an occupation then the armed forces. i don't like how the armed forces usually tries to pitch enlistment based on 'its great fun and it'll build character' and don't mention post traumatic stress syndrome.

for the army to recruit young people and for it to be morally agreeable in my eyes there should be tests that demonstrate the enlistee's understanding of the potential and likely risks they are signing up for. if they do this already that's great, iv just never heard of it.

i don't think a draft should ever be used in an educated democracy. if people wanted to go fight for their country's foreign agendas then they have the option, otherwise its time to change the education system so people understand why its important they fight.
 
  • #76
Pointless, random, ranting neohippieism. Just wanted to let you all know I'd seen it but won't even bother trying to argue against it. At face value, it should be clear there is no need.
 
Last edited:
  • #77
Ivan Seeking said:
I think so. I see commercial after commercial about how the military will do this or that or the other thing for a person - provide education, skills, travel, teach you to look a man in the eye and shake hands firmly, :rolleyes: - and I have seen the results - mental problems, alcoholism, a lack of respect for life, cult style brainwashing [patriotism], not to mention four years of utter boredom by most accounts. Oh yes, and then there's the flag draped coffins.
I came within a few hours of signing a six year active duty commitment as a Nuclear Officer in the Navy, and I am very thankful that at the last possible moment, someone talked me out of joining.
Well, I think this happens to be, at best, a huge sweeping statement that has very little basis in truth other than the limited exposure Ivan has had.

So let's see here, we have never seen alcoholism, mental problems or premature deaths ANYWHERE else other than the military? Of course, we don't see people being burried in civilian life on the news every day and they don't get flags, so I guess that's not worth mentioning.

I, like Integral, owe a lot to my stay inthe Army. I saw what combat I did and I did EXACTLY what the commercials said I would do. I travelled, I lived in Germany for 3 years, I made money, I saved enough for college (which my family could not afford) and I made some very good friends that I still am in contact to this day with. Most of all, it also gave me my career. I can not imagine what my life would have been like without my stint. For every person Ivan saw in that VA hospital, I would bet there are 100 that benefitted greatly from their service and 1000 that really could have taken it or left it, but are not traumatized in any way.

This thread reminds me of the idiots who joined the reserves or National Guard for the selfish reasons of some extra money and the GI bill. Oh, you mean I have to do what the government said I may have to do? What they trained me to do? Time to complain and become a concientous objector.

I think this thread is inappropriate at best until Ivan backs up his claims with anything other than his own opinions. Nowhere other than the GD forum would this be tolerated.
 
  • #78
1961 --- "... pay any price, bear any burden ..."
1965 --- "Hell no. (They) won't go."

2001 --- No particularly memorable words.
2005 --- The "instant gratification," full diaper lib crowd is right on schedule.

Wonder what math department they're planning on blowing up this time around.

S'pose any mayor in the country is going to be willing to host the democratic convention in '08?

Instead of Cooper-Church what're we going to get? Kennedy-Feinstein? Or, maybe Clinton-Kennedy? Clinton-Kennedy-Feinstein?

Sit through the same snivelling two or three times (the first time was boring as hell), and it's no wonder no one takes libs or dems seriously.
 
  • #79
Ivan Seeking said:
I think so. I see commercial after commercial about how the military will do this or that or the other thing for a person - provide education, skills, travel, teach you to look a man in the eye and shake hands firmly, :rolleyes: - and I have seen the results - mental problems, alcoholism, a lack of respect for life, cult style brainwashing [patriotism], not to mention four years of utter boredom by most accounts. Oh yes, and then there's the flag draped coffins.
I came within a few hours of signing a six year active duty commitment as a Nuclear Officer in the Navy, and I am very thankful that at the last possible moment, someone talked me out of joining.
Mental problems and alcoholism among military members is about the same as that for the civilian population. It does receive a little more attention in the military because of its cost - 25% of military members that develop mental disorders or came into the service with mental disorders are out of the service within 6 months. Losing the investment in training and experience is more expensive than the treatment. http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200303/ai_n9195957
 
  • #80
Mk said:
What would your father think if he were alive now about you thinking there is no honor in the military?
We have a picture of my father at (or after) the battle of the bulge. He is completely unrecognizable in the photo.

His sister said to him some years ago "That's not you!" and he replied in a disturbed voice: "War changes you, Lina."

My father would understand my position completely.
 
  • #81
Townsend said:
You did have a good reason and what you posted is fine by me. What I don't get is why you don't challenge Ivan's points when they are clearly very weak?
The question Ivan asked was as in the subject line above: "Is it immoral to sell kids on the military?" This question invites a response based on opinions rather than on evidence and fact (morality is subjective). My opinion regarding this issue, and I have no facts to back it up, is that yes, it is immoral to sell kids on the military (and, in my opinion, on religion as well). It is immoral because the kids have not had enough life experience to know what they are getting into - they are incapable of making an informed decision about something that is very important because it is going to shape what sort of person they become in the future (it is not relatively harmless advertising, after all, like adverts urging kids to buy a cd or computer game). My personal, subjectively-defined morals go against training kids to be killers. That is what people are trained to do in the military - by definition. Perhaps I'm wrong about this last statement? I think not - but I am sure people will let me know if I am wrong:rolleyes:
alex
 
  • #82
FredGarvin said:
This thread reminds me of the idiots who joined the reserves or National Guard for the selfish reasons of some extra money and the GI bill. Oh, you mean I have to do what the government said I may have to do? What they trained me to do? Time to complain and become a concientous objector.
In my opinion (note the word 'opinion'), this is exactly what Ivan was getting at: advertising the military as a way of gaining an education, traveling, etc (rather than as an institution that involves risking your life and learning how to kill others in a war situation) is exactly what leads to what you call 'the idiots' and their 'selfish reasons'. They are not idiots precisely because recruitment advertising is not honest: they were not told they would be required to do these things. They were promised a holiday and a free ride!
 
  • #83
alexandra said:
That is what people are trained to do in the military - by definition. Perhaps I'm wrong about this last statement? I think not - but I am sure people will let me know if I am wrong:rolleyes:
alex

The only gun I ever fired in the line of duty was a .22 caliber rifle at a test range. I was trained to be an aircraft mechanic and to be teach people coming out of boot camp how to be aircraft mechanics. After over 8 years I could never see another jet and I wouldn't mind it at all...it's just not my cup of tea. I could have easily made good living from my training and experience if it was something I would have liked to do. There are thousands of jobs in the military that have no killing as a part of your training. For example, the Navy corpsmen are trained to save lives, not kill.

Those are some facts for you to consider while forming your opinion.
 
  • #84
alexandra said:
In my opinion (note the word 'opinion'), this is exactly what Ivan was getting at: advertising the military as a way of gaining an education, traveling, etc (rather than as an institution that involves risking your life and learning how to kill others in a war situation) is exactly what leads to what you call 'the idiots' and their 'selfish reasons'. They are not idiots precisely because recruitment advertising is not honest: they were not told they would be required to do these things. They were promised a holiday and a free ride!

If that is what Ivan was getting at then I would have agreed with him from the start. Like I said...I wish they were honest about what they are selling to kids and I would agree that they are not. I would like to see that change...

But that does not make it immoral to sell it kids...it makes it immoral to lie to kids about what they are getting into. Two very different things.
 
  • #85
alexandra said:
In my opinion (note the word 'opinion'), this is exactly what Ivan was getting at: advertising the military as a way of gaining an education, traveling, etc (rather than as an institution that involves risking your life and learning how to kill others in a war situation) is exactly what leads to what you call 'the idiots' and their 'selfish reasons'. They are not idiots precisely because recruitment advertising is not honest: they were not told they would be required to do these things. They were promised a holiday and a free ride!
It is your opinion, but my opinion is that it is absolutely WRONG. The first year I was in training I served with both active duty and reservists. Every day we were drilled with the idea of why we were there and why we were learning what we were. Make no mistake, you knew that you were going into learn how to be a soldier. Also, despite popular belief, there are a lot of opportunities for people to get out in the initial training phases. Every single person who goes into the military knows that they may be called upon to go to war. I defy anyone to try to tell me that the only reason they were in basic training or advanced training was because the government had to have you do "something" to earn all that money you were promised. I call those people idiots and selfish because they knew they could be called, but they decided to play the odds for some easy money and perks and lost.
 
  • #86
The only gun I ever fired in the line of duty was a .22 caliber rifle at a test range. I was trained to be an aircraft mechanic and to be teach people coming out of boot camp how to be aircraft mechanics. After over 8 years I could never see another jet and I wouldn't mind it at all...it's just not my cup of tea. I could have easily made good living from my training and experience if it was something I would have liked to do. There are thousands of jobs in the military that have no killing as a part of your training. For example, the Navy corpsmen are trained to save lives, not kill.

I was wondering. Did you get to choose to be a machanic? I'm curious as to exactly how people get certain jobs once they sign up.
 
  • #87
FredGarvin said:
I defy anyone to try to tell me that the only reason they were in basic training or advanced training was because the government had to have you do "something" to earn all that money you were promised. I call those people idiots and selfish because they knew they could be called, but they decided to play the odds for some easy money and perks and lost.

Recruiters will and have lied to people to get them to join the military. This is a fact and that is what I have a problem with. I have heard recruiters tell kids that they will not likely have to live on a ship or go over seas...the statements are lies and they shouldn't be try to trick people into thinking it's a joy ride.
 
  • #88
Entropy said:
I was wondering. Did you get to choose to be a machanic? I'm curious as to exactly how people get certain jobs once they sign up.

My choices were limited by the fact that I was a bad boy...in other words I couldn't get a security clearance. Beyond that I was able to choose from a list of jobs where the Navy needed people with my aptitude and abilities.

For example, they wouldn’t want me to be a CS (mess specialist) because I scored relatively well in mechanical aptitude.

But you don’t have to join unless you are happy with the contract they give you. If you want to be an aircraft mechanic and they won’t let, just walk out. They cannot stop you. So the choice is really up to you.
 
  • #89
Townsend said:
Recruiters will and have lied to people to get them to join the military. This is a fact and that is what I have a problem with. I have heard recruiters tell kids that they will not likely have to live on a ship or go over seas...the statements are lies and they shouldn't be try to trick people into thinking it's a joy ride.

That is partly what happened in my case. The recruiter didn't really lie but he made very misleading statements. Also, a few issues came up such as, the likely results if I ran into problems in school for some reason. I could end up anywhere doing anything with a six year commitment. Beyond that he made the nearly certain sub duty sound like a vacation. The person that I mentioned who talked me out of joining had been in the Navy and had known submariners. The reality was nothing like that described by the recruiter. And if I didn't qualify psychologically for sub duty, which was likely, I would spend 2 years in school and then 4 years in the bowels of a carrier. Again, not what I had been told. The bottom line is that I walked away feeling as though I very nearly made a huge mistake based on a cheesy sales pitch.
 
Last edited:
  • #90
Okay let's take one thing at a time.

True or false: Boot camp is designed to reduce a person to the lowest level and then build them back up with the desired mindset.

True or false: This is precisely how cults brainwash their members. In fact, this is one clue used to identifiy cults.
 
  • #91
Thats two things at a time.
 
  • #92
Smurf said:
Thats two things at a time.

:smile: I used two sentences.
 
  • #93
three, actually.
 
  • #94
Entropy said:
I was wondering. Did you get to choose to be a machanic? I'm curious as to exactly how people get certain jobs once they sign up.
Depends. You can join with a 'guaranteed' career field (1C600 - Space Operations Specialist, for example), or you can join with a 'guaranteed' range of career fields (Open Electronics, for example), or you can join with an open career field (you get whatever job the military gives you).

If you have a guaranteed career field and they can't give that to you, you can leave - they'll even pay your plane ticket back home ... or you can choose a different career field, which is what most do since it's towards the end of basic training that you would find out that you're not qualified for the job (security) or that the job is overfilled (too many passed the security screening) or some other reason.

Your chances of getting the job they guaranteed is extremely good, especially if the job requires a high ASVAB score. They don't just yank your chain for the heck of it. It's just the guarantee is more like the money back guarantee your store gives you - instead of making satisfaction 100% certain, it just makes sure you don't suffer a major loss if they can't live up to their end of the bargain.
 
  • #95
Ivan Seeking said:
Okay let's take one thing at a time.
True or false: Boot camp is designed to reduce a person to the lowest level and then build them back up with the desired mindset.
True or false: This is precisely how cults brainwash their members. In fact, this is one clue used to identifiy cults.
The first: Maybe in the Marines. Maybe even in the Army. I doubt it. It's false for the Air Force.

The second: Maybe. I think that's more commonly used to break down prisoners of war during interrogations and can work, provided the desired mindset isn't one that requires much complicated thought.

More common among groups is the practice of making sure the joining process is an extreme ordeal. The greater ordeal a person had to endure to join an organization, the more initial loyalty they feel towards it (a self-fulfilling prophecy that going through the ordeal was worth it). That applies to some military groups (I've read of a pretty painful initiation for a paratrooper unit where they slam the wings onto your uniform without the little frogs on the back). It also used to be common for many fraternities. That still wouldn't be an accurate description of Air Force basic training, but the Air Force is probably pretty far from being the toughest basic training in the military. It's stressful, to be sure - they might give you a 341 (a demerit) or you might get guard duty in the middle of the night - but it can be endured.
 
  • #96
Townsend said:
You certainly don't have the decency to think about something beside politics long enough to realize there are good reasons to join the military even if it is during an unjust war.

That is a big enough difference that I don't we are anything alike.

This is some insanely fallacious reasoning.

By volunteering to join the military service of an aggressive and imperialistic nation, you are supporting that nation's policies.

By joining during an unjust war (as all wars of aggression are unjust) you are supporting that war, whether actively or by proxy.

I understand that part of the oath military service(men/women) take is an oath to uphold the law of the land (the constitution of the United States of America). If this oath were taken seriously, there should have been a military coup in this nation - the commander in chief (and not just this one, almost all of the presidents in this nation's history) have taken us into an ILLEGAL WAR (BY UNITED STATES LAW). Congress has made no formal declaration - we are not legally at war. But everyone knows its a war.

Whether or not you care to admit it, or whether you are even privy to such knowledge (of the constitution and hopefully the preamble to the declaration), by joining up you are very much supporting these policies.

This nationalistic line of reasoning can easily be extended to justify the service of Nazi soldiers. No doubt you would make a "good German" Townsend.
 
Last edited:
  • #97
BobG said:
Maybe in the Marines.
This is true. You will NEVER be able to do ANYTHING correctly. Everything you do is way too slow for drill instructors and they SEE EVERYTHING! You are kept exhausted from the night you get there and everything is fed to you at almost a Clockwork Orange pace. Marines are typically still gunshy for a few months after bootcamp. The Discovery channel shows on Marine Corps Boot Camp are cute. Imagine, if you will, having a sadistic bigger brother or sister while mom & dad going away for 4 months and you aren't allowed to contact them except for one day not at your choosing. You can write and tell them everything but there's still nothing they can do.
BobG said:
I've read of a pretty painful initiation for a paratrooper unit where they slam the wings onto your uniform without the little frogs on the back.
Marines too. Then they started making the chevrons out of plastic and that ended that until there were too many complaints because the plastic ones were just cruddy. Once the "rite" is over you are instantly treated differently. Ask any Marine Corporal who just had his chevrons and blood-stripes pinned on, both on the same day.
To stay on topic: I think more than anything, the military is an economic draft and preys on the uninformed. If someone had told me that in college girls get really, really drunk and do crazy things, I would have NEVER joined the military. Hey, I led a sheltered childhood, sue me.
 
  • #98
The things that bother me about current recruitment are:

Sign up bonuses of up to $16,000 are being offered to new recruits who will sign up for a combat MOS. To me this is simply "buying" recruits from low income and underpriviledged areas.

The No Child Left Behind Act, requires schools who receive federal funds to give their students personal information to military recruiters. The schools in wealthy areas don't need the federal funds.

These practices result in the same economic disparity in the military that existed during the Vietnam era.

SEC. 9528. ARMED FORCES RECRUITER ACCESS TO STUDENTS AND STUDENT RECRUITING INFORMATION.

(a) POLICY-

(1) ACCESS TO STUDENT RECRUITING INFORMATION- Notwithstanding section 444(a)(5)(B) of the General Education Provisions Act and except as provided in paragraph (2), each local educational agency receiving assistance under this Act shall provide, on a request made by military recruiters or an institution of higher education, access to secondary school students names, addresses, and telephone listings.
 
  • #99
I went to a vocational school in 11th grade, so I had to take the ASVAB test. I scored an overall 98 and had a lot of visits and calls from recruiters. I didn't join out of high school. A few years later my sister was considering joining the Air force, and the recruiters came across my test scores again.

What decided me against the military was when they told me I would not be cannon fodder, because of my intelligence and proficiency with computers.

I don't want anyone to be cannon fodder. I felt that the mindset where some human lives were expendible was inherently flawed.
 
  • #100
I was thinking about joining the military out of high school. I'm glad I didn't.
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
10K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
5K
Replies
65
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
Back
Top