Is it possible for one celestial body to trail another indefinetly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MickN
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body
AI Thread Summary
One celestial body cannot trail another indefinitely under the influence of gravity without either orbiting or crashing into it. In a two-body system, the less massive body will always be pulled toward the more massive one, requiring constant external force to maintain a static relationship. However, introducing a third massive body can create scenarios where one body appears to trail another as they orbit a central mass, specifically at stable Lagrangian points L4 and L5. These points allow for a configuration where the trailing body is influenced by the gravity of both the central mass and the leading body. Additionally, if a comet breaks apart, its fragments will not remain in a stable configuration indefinitely due to gravitational interactions.
MickN
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In other words, are there any circumstances in which one object, captured by the gravity of another, would simply trail behind it indefinitely, instead of revolving around it or crashing into it? Is it possible? It seems reasonable to me that under certain circumstances it could happen, but someone tells me it's impossible, and that, except in the case of one object breaking up into several (like a commit breaking up), it can't happen.

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
As long as there are just two bodies under each other's gravitational influence, it's not possible.
Take a simplified scenario, where one of the bodies is much less massive(m) than the other(M), so that only the massive one attracts the light one. The m body will always feel the force of gravity, constantly accelerating towards M. To preserve the intial setup where both are at rest with respect to each other, you'd have to constantly keep pushing the body M away at the same rate as it pulls in the body m.

If you introduce a third massive body, that both M and m are orbiting, then you can get a class of solutions that is close to what you're asking for. Namely, M and m can follow one another as they orbit the central mass. In this case, the body m is at all times under the gravitational influence of M, as well as the central mass, so it can be said that it is trailing M.

These solutions are called the Lagrangian points.
300px-Lagrange_very_massive.svg.png

(the blue blob representing M, the red dot m)
Of these five points, only L4 and L5 are stable.

To reiterate, if by trailing you mean being affected by the gravity of another body but neither obiting it nor changing the distance to it, then L4 and L5 should do.

By the way, a comet(or any other body) breaking into parts will not stay in a static configuration indefinitely. Either the parts will move towards each other under mutual gravitational attraction, or move away from each other affected by whatever force caused the breakup in the first place(tidal forces for example).
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top