A Is it possible for variable speed of light in a vacuum?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of a variable speed of light in a vacuum, linked to the expanding universe and changes in vacuum characteristics. A paper proposing this idea is criticized for lacking credibility, as the author is not a physicist and the source is deemed questionable. A review of research indicates that no variation in the fine structure constant, which relates to the speed of light, has been observed over time. Additionally, it is clarified that the density of dark energy remains constant despite the universe's expansion. The thread concludes with a consensus against the validity of the proposed paper.
kissfire
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
Here is a paper which proposed the possbility and provided some evidence.
<unacceptable reference deleted>

As our universe is expanding, that is, our vacuum is becoming more and more sparse, I believe it is possible that some key characterics of our vacuum is also variable.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
kissfire said:
Here is a paper which proposed the possbility and provided some evidence.
This paper looks highly questionable to me. The author is not a physicist and does not appear to understand the physics being used.

A good review by physicists of research into the possibility of variation in the fine structure constant (which is what "variable speed of light in a vacuum" actually means physically; the fine structure constant is the relevant invariant quantity) is here:

https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9803165

The bottom line is that no variation over time of the fine structure constant has been found, from today back as far into the early universe as we have evidence.

kissfire said:
As our universe is expanding, that is, our vacuum is becoming more and more sparse
No, it isn't. The density of dark energy is constant; it does not decrease as the universe expands.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes russ_watters, topsquark and FactChecker
kissfire said:
Summary: Here is a paper which proposed the possbility and provided some evidence.

<unacceptable reference deleted>
This paper is not an acceptable source. It is not even listed in either the Clarivate MJL or the Eigenfactor databases. It does not have an impact factor but advertises a high impact factor based on a Google search impact factor. It claims to be peer reviewed but promises publication in 2 to 3 days. It has all of the hallmarks of a predatory publisher and we do not support such unethical practices.

This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark
Hello, everyone, hope someone will resolve my doubts. I have posted here some two years ago asking for an explanation of the Lorentz transforms derivation found in the Einstein 1905 paper. The answer I got seemed quite satisfactory. Two years after I revisit this derivation and this is what I see. In the Einstein original paper, the Lorentz transforms derivation included as a premise that light is always propagated along the direction perpendicular to the line of motion when viewed from the...