Is it possible? If so, provide an example. If not, prove it

  • Thread starter Thread starter rollinthedeep
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Example
rollinthedeep
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A continuous function g: Q x Q --> R such that g(0,0)=0 and g(1,1)=1, but there does not exist any x,y\in Q such that g(x,y)=1/2

Homework Equations


Mean value theorem?

The Attempt at a Solution


I want to say no, because I'm sure there's something going on because the domain is not R x R...but I can't put my finger on it. Any advice?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if I say something meaningful here, but first of all:
- may we first think of a \mathbb{Q} \rightarrow \mathbb{R} application ? It looks simpler and it could provide a useful mind training.

So that, if I let g(x)=(x+ \pi), there's no way to make g(x)= {1 \over 2}.

\pi is irrational, it has infinite figures, so there's no way to make a rational x to cancel out all the decimals of \pi.
 
I think the whole two-variables thing is a bit of a red herring, so to make things a bit more transparent, rephrase the question by letting g(x,y)=f((x+y)/2).

We're after f:Q-->R with f(0)=0 and f(1)=1, and no x with f(x)=1/2. We can actually do much better and have function Q-->Q. This is an excercise in showing that rational numbers are rubbish for analysis: it's a counterexample to the intermediate value theorem for Q.

Here's a clue: what's the square root of 1/2?
 
henry_m said:
I think the whole two-variables thing is a bit of a red herring, so to make things a bit more transparent, rephrase the question by letting g(x,y)=f((x+y)/2).

We're after f:Q-->R with f(0)=0 and f(1)=1, and no x with f(x)=1/2. We can actually do much better and have function Q-->Q. This is an excercise in showing that rational numbers are rubbish for analysis: it's a counterexample to the intermediate value theorem for Q.

Here's a clue: what's the square root of 1/2?

1 \over \sqrt2

Let me say:f(x) = x^2

f(0) = 0
f(1) = 1
f(x) = 1/2 , x is irrational
 
Is there a way to prove it beyond just giving a counterexample?
 
A counterexample is how you prove a general statement is NOT true.
 
But it's not a general statement. It says to give an example if it is possible...so not for all, just there exists...don't I have to do more to prove it isn't possible at all?
 
Nevermind, I read it wrong. Thanks so much for your help!
 
Thread locked.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top