Passionflower
- 1,543
- 0
This comes up almost as often as the twin "paradox".rjbeery said:My first thought was that the very postulate of Rinder horizons is an affront against Einstein's "constancy of the speed of light", as a light source beyond the horizon would not be seen.
The speed of light is c when an observer makes a local measurement! If an observer makes a distance measurement or an average speed measurement between two locations the speed of light is not necessarily c. It is not c and anisotropic in case the observer undergoes proper or inertial acceleration.
I do not agree.rjbeery said:We all agree that there are sufficient practical barriers to a Rindler horizon, correct (infinite fuel source, CMB annihilation, etc)?
Even for travelers on a bullet train slowly accelerating from 0 to a top speed of 200 miles/hour in a timespan of one hour there is a Rindler horizon. Only after the acceleration stops the horizon will disappear.
Did you read question and answer nine of Ted Bunn's article?
Last edited: