Is it possible to be completely still in space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jaydnul
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
Motion in space is inherently relative, making it impossible to be completely still without a defined frame of reference. While the cosmic microwave background (CMB) can be used to measure velocities, it does not provide an absolute reference frame. The concept of an "absolute reference frame" is questioned, as no such frame exists that is deemed special by the laws of physics. Therefore, any motion must be understood in relation to other objects or frames. Ultimately, complete stillness in space is unattainable due to the nature of motion itself.
jaydnul
Messages
558
Reaction score
15
So we are on a rotating planet, which also hurdles through space orbiting the sun, which also is hurdling through space orbiting the center of the galaxy. Is it possible to be motionless in space?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
lundyjb said:
So we are on a rotating planet, which also hurdles through space orbiting the sun, which also is hurdling through space orbiting the center of the galaxy. Is it possible to be motionless in space?

Relative to what? Motion is relative. If you are searching for an absolute frame of reference, there isn't one.
 
If you are searching for an absolute frame of reference, there isn't one.

What about the cosmic microwave background; could that not be considered as an absolute F of R?
 
Endervhar said:
What about the cosmic microwave background; could that not be considered as an absolute F of R?

No, there is not such thing as an absolute frame of reference. You can state the Earth's velocity (or anything else's velocity if you wish) relative to the CMB, but it is not an absolute velocity in any sense.
 
Last edited:
Endervhar said:
What about the cosmic microwave background; could that not be considered as an absolute F of R?

Ask yourself this. What does "absolute reference frame" mean?
 
Endervhar said:
What about the cosmic microwave background; could that not be considered as an absolute F of R?

The CMB does define a frame of reference, but the laws of physics don't single out that frame of reference as special.
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
Today at about 4:30 am I saw the conjunction of Venus and Jupiter, where they were about the width of the full moon, or one half degree apart. Did anyone else see it? Edit: The moon is 2,200 miles in diameter and at a distance of 240,000 miles. Thereby it subtends an angle in radians of 2,200/240,000=.01 (approximately). With pi radians being 180 degrees, one radian is 57.3 degrees, so that .01 radians is about .50 degrees (angle subtended by the moon). (.57 to be more exact, but with...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top