I Is it possible to calculate Tsupercon from the unit cell?

jonjacson
Messages
450
Reaction score
38
Hi folks,

It is an elementary question for people expert in superconductivity.

I know there is a theory, the BCS theory, and the GIzburg Landau theory too that apparently explains superconductivity.

My question is, if I give you a unit cell would you be able to tell me the temperature at which that solid enters into the superconducting state?

And the same question for high temperature superconductors, Is there a theory that tells you the Tc if the unit cell is known?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For BCS (conventional) superconductor it is possible to calculate Tc if you know the structure (which we nearly always do, we are very, very good at determining crystal structures). However, you need advanced computer simulations to do so, it can't be done analytically.

High temperature superconductor are very different. We do not even fully understand why these materials are superconducting, meaning there are no models that can be used to predict Tc.
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
f95toli said:
For BCS (conventional) superconductor it is possible to calculate Tc if you know the structure (which we nearly always do, we are very, very good at determining crystal structures). However, you need advanced computer simulations to do so, it can't be done analytically.

High temperature superconductor are very different. We do not even fully understand why these materials are superconducting, meaning there are no models that can be used to predict Tc.

Thanks!

So scientists are able to synthesize them but without the underlying theory, interesting.
 
jonjacson said:
Thanks!

So scientists are able to synthesize them but without the underlying theory, interesting.

We do have SOME ideas about what makes them superconducting (e.g. the role of the CuO2 in the cuprates) so it is not like the chemists are just combining elements at random, if you look at the structure of say the cuprates you will find that they have a similar structure so that is a clue.

But yes, it is very possible that there are many more superconducting compounds out there that we don't know of (see the fairly recent discovery of the pnictides)
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
Look into:
The Eliashberg-Migdal formalism (basically extended BCS theory), and also
Dynamical Mean Field Theory (Kotliar) which has successfully predicted a superconductor (if I recall correctly, it was high-temperature).

It's complicated stuff!
 
  • Like
Likes jonjacson
Thanks!

I will have a look.

I know, but it is very interesting.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top