Is it possible to simplify this Atwood machine problem?

Click For Summary
Simplifying the Atwood machine problem is possible under the condition that the two masses are equal, which eliminates relative acceleration and simplifies tension calculations. The tension in the string connecting the two masses is defined by the formula T = (2m1m2 / (m1 + m2))g, and the tension in the upper string is twice that when the masses are equal. However, when using Lagrange's equations, it is necessary to treat the masses as separate entities. The discussion emphasizes that while an equivalent mass can be used for simplification, it should only be applied when the masses are equal. Understanding these principles clarifies the problem-solving approach for the Atwood machine.
linusjak
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
So this might be completly wrong but i'm thinking since we only care about pulley A and everything moves in a vertical line i should just be able to simplify the entire second pulley to a weight with mass 3m, is this possible to do? why or why not?
Relevant Equations
Lagrange Equations
Screenshot (107).webp
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could do that if ##m_B=m_C##, i.e. there is no relative acceleration of the two masses. The relative acceleration changes the tension in the upper string from what it would be if the masses were equal. Remember that in a simple Atwood machine with one pulley and two masses the tension in the string connecting the two masses is$$T=\frac{2m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}g$$ in which case the tension in the string that connects the pulley to the ceiling is twice that and equal to the sum of the masses only when they are equal.

On edit
The answer to your title question is yes, you can replace the Atwood machine with a single equivalent mass but not the way you propose. How you do that is hinted in my answer above. It is also Rule I in this article. However, the problem is asking you specifically to use Lagrange's equations and that you must do by considering the Atwood machine masses as separate. Perhaps you could check your answer by using the equivalent mass shortcut as well.
 
Last edited:
kuruman said:
You could do that if ##m_B=m_C##, i.e. there is no relative acceleration of the two masses. The relative acceleration changes the tension in the upper string from what it would be if the masses were equal. Remember that in a simple Atwood machine with one pulley and two masses the tension in the string connecting the two masses is$$T=\frac{2m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}g$$ in which case the tension in the string that connects the pulley to the ceiling is twice that and equal to the sum of the masses only when they are equal.
Thank you that helps a lot, makes sense now!!
 
At first, I derived that: $$\nabla \frac 1{\mu}=-\frac 1{{\mu}^3}\left((1-\beta^2)+\frac{\dot{\vec\beta}\cdot\vec R}c\right)\vec R$$ (dot means differentiation with respect to ##t'##). I assume this result is true because it gives valid result for magnetic field. To find electric field one should also derive partial derivative of ##\vec A## with respect to ##t##. I've used chain rule, substituted ##\vec A## and used derivative of product formula. $$\frac {\partial \vec A}{\partial t}=\frac...