Is it possible to specify a 3d surface in 4d space with just one vector?

AI Thread Summary
In 4D space, a 3D hyperplane cannot be specified by a single vector alone; it requires both a normal vector and a point within the hyperplane. Without the point, the result is a family of parallel hyperplanes rather than a specific one. The general principle is that an n-1 dimensional hyperplane in n dimensions needs both a normal vector and a point for precise definition. In the context of 4D, if the hyperplane includes the origin, it can be represented mathematically, but this representation fails for hyperplanes not passing through the origin. Thus, specifying a hyperplane in 4D space necessitates more information than just one vector.
dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
I hope this is the right forum...

In 3d space, a 2d plane can be specified by it's normal vector. In 4d space, is there a 3d plane, and will these planes be specifiable by a single vector?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
dEdt said:
I hope this is the right forum...

In 3d space, a 2d plane can be specified by it's normal vector.
No, that's not enough information. You can specify a plane in R3 by its normal vector and a point on the plane. Without that point what you get is a family of parallel planes.
dEdt said:
In 4d space, is there a 3d plane, and will these planes be specifiable by a single vector?
In higher dimensions, including R4, we call them hyperplanes. And again, a single vector isn't enough.
 
In general, we can specify a n-1 dimensional hyperplane in a space of n dimensions with a "normal vector" and a point in the hyperplane.

In four dimensions, every point can be written as (x_1, x_2, x_3, x_4) and a four dimensional vector of the form a\vec{ix}+ b\vec{j}+ c\vec{k}+ d\vec{l}. If the origin, (0, 0, 0, 0) is in the hyperplane, then we can write x_1\vec{ix}+ x_2\vec{j}+ x_3\vec{k}+ x_4\vec{l} and so the dot product is ax_1+ bx_2+ cx_3+ dx_4= 0 giving an equation for that hyper plane. But, again, that assumes the hyperplane contains the point (0, 0, 0). Another plane, perpendicular to the same vector, but not containing (0, 0, 0), cannot be written that way.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top