Is it possible to suck air out of drilling hole completely?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter ahmed11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Air Hole
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the feasibility of completely removing air from a borehole to eliminate pressure changes during drilling operations. Participants clarify that achieving a hard vacuum is challenging and that the presence of formation fluids, which are incompressible, maintains pressure regardless of air removal. The consensus is that simply sucking air out of the hole will not prevent pressure influx from formation fluids, as the pressure is inherent to the geological conditions, not dependent on the presence of air.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of drilling operations and borehole dynamics.
  • Knowledge of formation pressure and its impact on drilling.
  • Familiarity with drilling fluids and their density compared to formation fluids.
  • Basic principles of vacuum creation and its limitations in geological contexts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of formation pressure in oil and gas drilling.
  • Learn about the properties and roles of drilling fluids in maintaining wellbore stability.
  • Investigate vacuum technology and its applications in drilling and geological exploration.
  • Explore case studies on pressure management in boreholes and well control techniques.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for drilling engineers, geologists, and anyone involved in oil and gas extraction who seeks to understand pressure management and the dynamics of boreholes.

ahmed11
Messages
83
Reaction score
0
and after sucking air out we seal off the hole in order to eliminate any change in influx and pressure downhole?
and if possible, what would be the procedure?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Ahmed,

Is this about holes in wood, plastic, metal ? Or about holes in the Earth ?
You cannot assume everybody who wants to help knows everything about your context - or posesses telepathic capabilities !
 
How does the air stay down there in the first place. Wouldn't it rise up through the borehole?

Chet
 
The word completely in the title suggests removing 100% of the air leaving a vacuum. Hard vacuums are difficult to produce. What are you trying to achieve?
 
CWatters said:
The word completely in the title suggests removing 100% of the air leaving a vacuum. Hard vacuums are difficult to produce. What are you trying to achieve?
He's talking about boreholes for wells drilled into the ground, which are typically filled with water up to the water table. He seems to be asking if air can be removed (a second phase) from below the water level. Most wells for oil and gas production have a pipe running down the center of the borehole that is cemented in place to the surrounding geological formation (except at the very bottom few meters). Where this air would be located and how it got there would be the puzzle to me.

Chet
 
i mean when if i drill with a small machine underground and seal off the hole after machine is set underground and all air is sucked out, will that eliminate the change in pressure. the machine will be underground and no air will be to enter the hole from the surface so that will cancel the change in influx and resulting in a kick, right?(my theory is that pressure of any kind is present when air is, i think)
i'm just thinking out loud here so would really appreciate your help.
thanks..
 
ahmed11 said:
i mean when if i drill with a small machine underground and seal off the hole after machine is set underground and all air is sucked out, will that eliminate the change in pressure. the machine will be underground and no air will be to enter the hole from the surface so that will cancel the change in influx and resulting in a kick, right?(my theory is that pressure of any kind is present when air is, i think)
i'm just thinking out loud here so would really appreciate your help.
thanks..
I stand corrected.
 
so do you think my theory is correct?
i don't know if it was stated before or not, i tried looking online but couldn't find anything
 
ahmed11 said:
so do you think my theory is correct?
i don't know if it was stated before or not, i tried looking online but couldn't find anything
I'm really not able to even come close to understanding what you are asking.
 
  • #10
Chestermiller said:
I'm really not able to even come close to understanding what you are asking.
in usual drilling operations, drilling fluid is pumped into balance the formation pressure in order not to get a kick( change in influx rate from formation fluid and gases) and blowing. so instead of using drilling fluid which is more dense than the formation pressure we could suck air out of the hole when a small machine( a single machine like a small car for example) is set downhole and then seal off the hole. like drilling through an air free rock in outer space, if the rock isn't injected with air( drilling pipe) no matter the fluids in it, it won't change the ratio of pressure already present.
am i making any sense here?
 
  • #11
ahmed11 said:
in usual drilling operations, drilling fluid is pumped into balance the formation pressure in order not to get a kick( change in influx rate from formation fluid and gases) and blowing. so instead of using drilling fluid which is more dense than the formation pressure we could suck air out of the hole when a small machine( a single machine like a small car for example) is set downhole and then seal off the hole. like drilling through an air free rock in outer space, if the rock isn't injected with air( drilling pipe) no matter the fluids in it, it won't change the ratio of pressure already present.
am i making any sense here?
No. And I have some experience with drilling mud and formation fluids.
 
  • #12
ahmed11 said:
in usual drilling operations, drilling fluid is pumped into balance the formation pressure in order not to get a kick( change in influx rate from formation fluid and gases) and blowing. so instead of using drilling fluid which is more dense than the formation pressure we could suck air out of the hole when a small machine...

Unlike Chester I've no experience of drilling oil wells. However..

I can see how using a dense drilling fluid might help stop oil or gas being pushed up the drill hole. That makes sense.

I can see how using air instead of drilling fluid would be less effective. Air is less dense than drilling fluid so the pressure created at the bottom of the well by the air would be less than that created by drilling fluid. So it would be less able to counter the pressure in the oil/gas.

How would using something even less dense than air (like a vacuum) be better?

ahmed11 said:
am i making any sense here?

Not to me.
 
  • #13
He may think that if there is no air there is no pressure. Based on this quote:
"(my theory is that pressure of any kind is present when air is, i think)".
 
  • #14
nasu said:
He may think that if there is no air there is no pressure. Based on this quote:
"(my theory is that pressure of any kind is present when air is, i think)".
yes that's exactly what i mean. i know that air is less dense than the drilling fluid but if there is no air inside the hole from the beginning then oil and gas will be less dense therefore it won't blow up to the surface
right?
 
  • #15
Wrong. Formation pressure is formation pressure.
 
  • #16
Bystander said:
Wrong. Formation pressure is formation pressure.
can u explain why would it be wrong?
just for clarifying, when i suck air outside of the drilling string connected to the reservoir the formation fluids will be less dense so the pressure will decrease and it won't result in a kick
 
  • #17
What makes you have this strange idea that the formation fluids will be less dense? Formation fluids are virtually incompressible.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
  • #18
ahmed11 said:
yes that's exactly what i mean. i know that air is less dense than the drilling fluid but if there is no air inside the hole from the beginning then oil and gas will be less dense therefore it won't blow up to the surface
right?

regardless of if there is air or something else placed in the drill hole ... the oil and gas underground is under intense pressure and the presence or absence of anything else in the hole isn't going to change that

Chestermiller said:
What makes you have this strange idea that the formation fluids will be less dense? Formation fluids are virtually incompressible.

indeedDave
 
  • #19
ahmed11 said:
yes that's exactly what i mean. i know that air is less dense than the drilling fluid but if there is no air inside the hole from the beginning then oil and gas will be less dense therefore it won't blow up to the surface
right?

Removing the air won't make the oil or less dense. Even if it did make it less dense it wouldn't reduce the pressure. Its the pressure that causes the oil to be pushed to the surface.
 
  • #20
This thread is sucking the air out of all of us!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 256bits
  • #21
It seems to me that at these depths, if the hole could somehow be completely voided, would not the surrounding pressure collapse the hole?
 
  • #22
brotherStefan said:
It seems to me that at these depths, if the hole could somehow be completely voided, would not the surrounding pressure collapse the hole?
The hole is not completely void. It is filled with formation fluid up to the water table. If you tried to pump the water out of the hole, it would just flow out of the surrounding porous rock and fill up the hole again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
21K