Is it possible to use Newton's Law of Gravity AND Einstein's Theory of Gravity?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the compatibility of Newton's Law of Gravity and Einstein's Theory of Gravity, particularly in calculating gravitational force between two masses. It highlights that while Newton's formula can be used for low-energy scenarios, Einstein's theory describes the curvature of space-time rather than direct force calculations. To apply Einstein's theory, one would need to consider the curvature effects on objects rather than simply calculating force. An example of a high-energy scenario is the bending of light near massive objects, illustrating the practical application of Einstein's equations. Ultimately, the conversation emphasizes the distinction between calculating gravitational force and understanding the geometric nature of gravity in Einstein's framework.
studentxlol
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
to answer this question:

Q) A mass of 100kg is 50m away from a mass of 250kg (from centre of masses). Calculate the gravitational force of attraction between both point masses.

Could I use Einstein's theory of gravity to answer this question using the information given. If so, how would I go about doing it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since Newton's gravity is just a low-energy limit of Einstein gravity, you technically are using Einstein gravity when you compute F = {{GmM}\over{r^2}} :D
 
Pengwuino said:
Since Newton's gravity is just a low-energy limit of Einstein gravity, you technically are using Einstein gravity when you compute F = {{GmM}\over{r^2}} :D

Ok. Give me an example of a high-energy limit and what extra information I need to calculate using Einstein's formula.
 
studentxlol said:
to answer this question:

Q) A mass of 100kg is 50m away from a mass of 250kg (from centre of masses). Calculate the gravitational force of attraction between both point masses.

Could I use Einstein's theory of gravity to answer this question using the information given. If so, how would I go about doing it?
Einstein's equations don't calculate force. They describe the shape of space-time. Objects move along geodesics of the space-time. No force.
 
So you would actually have to calculate the curvature felt by each object, which would be a kind of sum of the distortions from each mass?
 
khemist said:
So you would actually have to calculate the curvature felt by each object, which would be a kind of sum of the distortions from each mass?
Yes. Probably the easiest calculation is the bending of light as it grazes the sun. There is an excellent book about this and very easy to read. "The Einstein theory of Relativity" by Lieber and Lieber.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top