Is it Reasonable to Assume our Galaxy is in a Steady State?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the assumption that the Milky Way Galaxy is in a steady state, supported by the fact that a typical disk star completes over thirty orbits in approximately 3×10^8 years. This orbital time frame suggests that the galaxy's dynamics have stabilized over extensive periods. Participants question whether significant changes might occur after the 31st revolution of a star. The conversation emphasizes the reliability of the steady-state assumption based on the long-term behavior of stars within the galaxy. Overall, the steady-state model appears reasonable given the evidence presented.
mmtwwla
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
How can we make the assumption that the Galaxy is approximately in a steady state at the present time?
I read this from the textbook:
"the time required to complete one orbit at 10kpc is 3×108yr... a typical disk star has completed over thirty revolutions, and hence it is reasonable to assume that the Galaxy is approximately in a steady state at the present time."
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
mmtwwla said:
How can we make the assumption that the Galaxy is approximately in a steady state at the present time?
I read this from the textbook:
"the time required to complete one orbit at 10kpc is 3×108yr... a typical disk star has completed over thirty revolutions, and hence it is reasonable to assume that the Galaxy is approximately in a steady state at the present time."

So, do you think that on the 31st revolution things are going to go crazy?
 
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Back
Top