Is it time for Random Thoughts - Part 4?

In summary: No, I'm not going to finish that.Some guy tried to sell me eh.. recreational tools today while I was getting groceries.I guess setting up a trashy website was too costly for him, so he just sold them in the frozen foods section at walmart.
  • #351
Every other science headline seems to be about 3-d printing.

I'm sure it's just a fad...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #352
Note to self: When moving a washing machine do not make assumptions about how much water may be left in the bottom. Unhooking the exhaust hose requires more than two pieces of paper towel under the machine. D'oh!
 
  • #353
Jonathan Scott said:
Schumann, Schubert ... what's the difference?

Sent off artwork to print 5000 brochures for my orchestra's next season, due back any day now, with the wrong one! :eek:
I know the feeling. I once manually entered 5 rather large admittance matrixes, that modeled our power system at different loads, that took about a week of typing; only to discover the format of the numbers wasn't what the software expected. :blushing: Luckily the computer had a Fortran compiler and I wrote some code to convert the numbers to the correct format. No one ever knew. :uhh:
 
  • #354
dlgoff said:
I know the feeling. I once manually entered 5 rather large admittance matrixes, that modeled our power system at different loads, that took about a week of typing; only to discover the format of the numbers wasn't what the software expected. :blushing: Luckily the computer had a Fortran compiler and I wrote some code to convert the numbers to the correct format. No one ever knew. :uhh:

Reminds me of the time I wrote a program to keep government grants from being charged to a certain object code. The program told me how many new accounts were generated, how many had been blocked, and how many valid accounts there were.

One day, all 10,000 accounts were blocked, and no valid accounts were available.

I decided that something was wrong, and ixnayed uploading the daily chart of accounts.

I had the only operable service center in operation that day.

:smile:

-----------------------------
That was about 15 years ago. As of late, the only thing I pat myself on the back for, is not pooping my pants. :redface:
 
  • #355
Journalism at its finest! :rofl:

http://www.upworthy.com/if-you-are-gonna-make-jokes-at-the-nsas-expense-might-as-well-do-it-right-to-the-old-boss-face-am2-1a
 
  • #356
Lol!
 
  • #357
Yanick said:
Note to self: When moving a washing machine do not make assumptions about how much water may be left in the bottom. Unhooking the exhaust hose requires more than two pieces of paper towel under the machine. D'oh!

hahaaaa, I burst laughing out loud like an idiot :D Did you have fun drying up the place? :P
 
  • #358
wow This isolation sickness thing is real. I haven't gone out and talked to people outside for weeks and I feel like my brain got dunked into a bucket of depressants.
 
Last edited:
  • #359
wukunlin said:
wow This isolation sickness thing is real. I haven't gone out and talked to people outside for weeks and I feel like my brain got dunked into a bucket of depressants.

yeah, that's how it goes. When I was on vacation during the winter, I hadn't gone out for like a week - completely alienated from society :/
 
  • #360
Spending more time on a final not related to my area of study than one that is related, because I actually want to ::gasp:: LEARN something. Heretical. I know.
 
  • #361
If I see one more "Physics without the maths" book on amazon I'm going to lose it.
Learning physics without the maths is like studying Chinese culture from Steven Seagal movies.
 
  • #362
HomogenousCow said:
If I see one more "Physics without the maths" book on amazon I'm going to lose it.
Learning physics without the maths is like studying Chinese culture from Steven Seagal movies.

But I love "Math without Physics" books.
 
  • #363
HomogenousCow said:
If I see one more "Physics without the maths" book on amazon I'm going to lose it.
Learning physics without the maths is like studying Chinese culture from Steven Seagal movies.

I think "wanting to learn physics without the maths" is similar "wanting to have a relationship with this girl without talking to her."
 
  • #364
wukunlin said:
I think "wanting to learn physics without the maths" is similar "wanting to have a relationship with this girl without talking to her."

Poetry, but with none of those icky words.
 
  • #365
lisab said:
And it's only Tuesday.

And *still*, it's only Tuesday.
 
  • #366
lisab said:
And *still*, it's only Tuesday.
And still %@#%!#!@^!
 
  • #367
:rofl:
 
  • #368
wukunlin said:
I think "wanting to learn physics without the maths" is similar "wanting to have a relationship with this girl without talking to her."

Or learning how to drive by religiously watching re-runs of Dukes of Hazzard.
 
  • #369
Why is the prescribed med come in bottles that challenge one's strength T_T why when patient is the most weak*sniffs*
 
  • #370
drizzle said:
Why is the prescribed med come in bottles that challenge one's strength T_T why when patient is the most weak*sniffs*

:frown: You can ask the pharmacist to dispense the meds in easy to open containers. Of course that's hard to remember when you're feeling bad!

I hope you're better soon!
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
  • #371
This is bad.
 
  • #372
Enigman said:
This is bad.

Rut-roh!
 
  • #373
aXbmNKV_460s.jpg
 
  • #374
Jet-Li-is-The-One-thumb.jpg
 
  • #375
zero?

Lol Borg! I should've known it's a troll. :grumpy:
 
  • #376
micromass said:
aXbmNKV_460s.jpg

That took a while...=5
 
  • #377
micromass said:
aXbmNKV_460s.jpg

62257.

The other equations are clearly wrong.
 
  • #378
lisab said:
62257.

The other equations are clearly wrong.


:rofl:
 
  • #379
Borg said:
Jet-Li-is-The-One-thumb.jpg

One is correct. Zero and 5 are not.
 
  • #380
micromass said:
aXbmNKV_460s.jpg

the same number as the answer to 21759 = ?.

(Just staking my claim to having solved it, without telling everybody the answer!)
 
  • #381
AlephZero said:
the same number as the answer to 21759 = ?.

(Just staking my claim to having solved it, without telling everybody the answer!)

Yep!
 
  • #382
micromass said:
One is correct. Zero and 5 are not.

Never said 5 was the answer.

This was an hint and a pun:
Enigman said:
"That took a while"=5
:rofl:
 
  • #383
Enigman said:
Never said 5 was the answer.

This was an hint and a pun:
:rofl:

Aah, you have the right answer then! :approve:
 
  • #384
Not going to waste a single second on this. :grumpy:
 
  • #385
drizzle said:
Not going to waste a single second on this. :grumpy:

You already did!
 

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
77
Replies
3K
Views
127K
Replies
3K
Views
326K
Replies
11K
Views
435K
  • General Discussion
16
Replies
548
Views
11K
  • General Discussion
115
Replies
4K
Views
192K
  • General Discussion
10
Replies
348
Views
45K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
40
Views
16K
Back
Top