I Is J0740+6620 an eclipsing system?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter GeorgeDishman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    System
AI Thread Summary
J0740+6620 is identified as potentially the most massive neutron star discovered, with its companion being a helium-atmosphere white dwarf. The estimated radius of the white dwarf is approximately 12,600 km, significantly smaller than earlier calculations. The semi-major axis of the white dwarf's orbit around the neutron star is about 1.2 million km, with an orbital inclination of 87.38 degrees. This configuration suggests that the system should exhibit eclipsing behavior, allowing for direct measurement of the neutron star's radius through the white dwarf's dimming during transits. The discussion highlights the importance of accurate calculations in understanding the dynamics of this binary system.
GeorgeDishman
Messages
419
Reaction score
29
TL;DR Summary
The inclination of the MSP orbit is 87.38 degrees or nearly edge on. If the system is eclipsing, it would imply the possibility exist of a direct observation of the radius of the NS against the background of the WD which would be a key parameter constraining the EoS.
It was recently announced that J0740+6620 contains what is probably the most massive neutron star found to date:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1904.06759.pdf
This paper concludes the companion to the MSP is a helium-atmosphere white dwarf:

https://arxiv.org/pdf/1902.11150.pdf
Based on a crude eyeball estimate from the graph here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_dwarf#Mass–radius_relationship_and_mass_limit
the radius of the WD would appear to be around 18% of the Solar radius, or about 125 thousand km.

The semi-major axis of the WD orbit around the NS is ~3.98 light seconds or 1.2 million km which, combined with the orbital inclination of 87.38 degrees, suggests a line of sight separation at conjunction of 28 thousand km or about 1/4 the radius of the WD.

Unless I've got my arithmetic wrong, that seems to suggest the system should be eclipsing and it should be possible to determine the radius of the NS directly from the dimming of the WD during transits. Is that correct?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Phys.org reports the mass at 0.2 solar mass. The radius of a white dwarf is proportional to the inverse cube root of the mass M(-1/3). It should have a 70% larger radius than a solar mass white dwarf. We can also eyeball the radius in the wikipedia chart you linked to around 0.02 solar radii or ~14,000 km.
 
  • Like
Likes Dragrath
stefan r said:
We can also eyeball the radius in the wikipedia chart you linked to around 0.02 solar radii or ~14,000 km.

Thank you, I eyeballed it with a missing zero as just under 0.2 instead of 0.02, my radius was too large by an order of magnitude.

Sadly, it's about 12600km radius but 28000km off the line of sight. :-(
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
This thread is dedicated to the beauty and awesomeness of our Universe. If you feel like it, please share video clips and photos (or nice animations) of space and objects in space in this thread. Your posts, clips and photos may by all means include scientific information; that does not make it less beautiful to me (n.b. the posts must of course comply with the PF guidelines, i.e. regarding science, only mainstream science is allowed, fringe/pseudoscience is not allowed). n.b. I start this...
Back
Top