Is Joining a Dynamical Systems Group in Brazil a Good Step for a Math Graduate?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ice109
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Student
AI Thread Summary
Graduating with a math degree from a state school and feeling unprepared for advanced studies is a common concern among undergraduates. The individual expresses anxiety about their qualifications, having completed a basic math curriculum without research experience. They plan to take time off to fill knowledge gaps and seek opportunities in a dynamical systems group in Brazil to enhance their profile for future master's applications. Concerns about expectations from professors and feelings of inadequacy are prevalent, but it's emphasized that many professors are accustomed to working with students who may not feel fully prepared. Research often begins at a comfortable level, allowing students to gradually build their skills. Engaging in basic projects and collaborating with more experienced peers can provide valuable learning experiences. Honesty about one's current capabilities is encouraged, as it fosters better mentorship and support from professors.
ice109
Messages
1,707
Reaction score
6
graduating from undergrad

i never thought i'd write one of these but here goes (a fishing for reassurance type thread)

i'm graduating this semester and I'm nervous about my qualifications. I'm graduating from a typical state school with decent gpa(~3.7) with what i consider a bare-essentials math degree: adv calc sequence, abstract algebra sequence, 1 semester topology at a really low level, 2 semesters linear alg, 1 semester pde, 1 semester applied complex analysis class, a fortran class, a physics degree minus 1 lab class, and no research.

the thing is I'm not applying to grad school because I've decided to take some time off and fill in gaps. i already know that if i had applied the best i could hope for is a decent master's program, probably even unfunded. i also know that won't change if i take time off and study on my own - the point of which is be prepared for the rigors of even just a decent program. what i am trying to do is find some a dynamical systems group in brazil (don't ask why) in the interim to basically tag along with so that at least superficially(to show masters programs) i can look like I'm doing something productive.

what I'm concerned about is what kind of expectations will people have of me? i know I'm not ready for research - I'm barely ready for baby rudin. is such a thing completely unheard of? am i insane for doing this? ideas? comments? concerns? I'm kind of not comfortable talking about this with any professors so i come here.

what i'd really love is to be able to be honest with professors but i think that that would disqualify me from anything. this is because essentially i only feel as comfortable as telling people I'm know better than an almost completely fresh student and academia isn't a charity...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ice109 said:
what i'd really love is to be able to be honest with professors but i think that that would disqualify me from anything.
Why? Professors take in vastly unqualified students all the time, and have many techniques to get them up to speed. Easy/basic projects and pairing them with someone who's been working in the lab for a while are standards, and as long as you're alright with that it shouldn't be a problem. Lying to a prof is just going to annoy him when you show up and can't do that thing he expected you to.

what I'm concerned about is what kind of expectations will people have of me? i know I'm not ready for research - I'm barely ready for baby rudin. is such a thing completely unheard of?
The whole trick with research is that it starts at the level you're comfortable with and you slowly teach yourself how to do progressively scarier stuff. There really isn't a "not ready for research" So fine, you can't do the heavy analysis for a publishable paper yet; you still may be perfectly capable of doing the grunt work of coding some mathematical simulations.
 
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top