I Is Kirchoff's Theorem Misunderstood in Relation to Power Absorption?

AI Thread Summary
Kirchoff's Theorem relates power emission and absorption, where the power emitted (e) is defined by the equation e=J(T,f)A, with A representing the power absorbed. The discussion raises a question about the interpretation of power supplied (E) and whether it can be expressed as e=E-A. Clarification is sought on what A specifically refers to in this context, particularly regarding the fraction of power absorbed by an object. The misunderstanding of the theorem is acknowledged, indicating a need for clearer definitions. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities in accurately applying Kirchoff's Theorem to power absorption scenarios.
Titan97
Gold Member
Messages
450
Reaction score
18
According to Kirchoff

$$e=J(T,f)A$$

##e## is the power emitted and ##A## is the power absorbed

If ##E## is the power supplied, can I say that

$$e=E-A$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"A" is the power absorbed by what?
 
by the object. I think i misunderstood the theorem.
A is the fraction of the power absorbed.
 

Similar threads

I Black Body and the colored objects around us
Replies
8
Views
2K
Black Body vs Non-Black Body: What Sets Them Apart in Kirchoff's Law?
Replies
3
Views
1K
Understanding Perfectly Black Bodies
Replies
5
Views
2K
I Gases: Not Required to Be Blackbodies
Replies
19
Views
17K
What is the Correct Way to Calculate Emissivity and Absorptivity?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Is Planck's Law of Black-Body Accurate?
Replies
7
Views
2K
How can we explain continuous absorption / emission?
Replies
1
Views
2K
I Why is the black body spectrum bell shaped if it's absorptance is equal to 1?
Replies
21
Views
2K
A Kirchhoff law for absorption and emission of a gas
Replies
2
Views
2K
I Lumens and the Luminosity Function
Replies
25
Views
5K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top