Is Light Intelligent? Speed of Light & Quantum Phenomena

  • Thread starter Thread starter M8M
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photons
M8M
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
The constancy of the speed of light = c. Is it possible that light "adjusts' it speed based on "knowing" the relative velocities of every object around itself? Is this an alternative to time and space changing with speed? Anything as bizarre as invariant speed also seems to be yet another strange quantum phenomenon.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
M8M said:
The constancy of the speed of light = c. Is it possible that light "adjusts' it speed based on "knowing" the relative velocities of every object around itself? Is this an alternative to time and space changing with speed? Anything as bizarre as invariant speed also seems to be yet another strange quantum phenomenon.

no, that's just silly.

Yes, the constancy of light speed IS pretty bizarre, but not as much as many things in quantum mechanics.

It appears that you want the universe to be make intuitive sense to humans. It doesn't. Get over it.
 
M8M said:
The constancy of the speed of light = c. Is it possible that light "adjusts' it speed based on "knowing" the relative velocities of every object around itself? Is this an alternative to time and space changing with speed? Anything as bizarre as invariant speed also seems to be yet another strange quantum phenomenon.

Two answers...
1) Yes, it is possible. But this is just idle speculation (that is, no one is likely to pay much attention to it) until this line of thought leads to a theory that predicts some result that is not predicted by relativity.

2) The notion that the speed of light in vacuum is constant for all observers isn't quite so bizarre if you consider that that speed can be derived from the laws of electricity and magnetism. The only way different observers could see different speeds of light would be if they were getting different laws of physics, and that's even more bizarre. One of the great challenges of physics a century ago was to work out which bizarreness we're stuck with.
 
Photons might be 'more intelligent' than us in that they can travel at 'c' and we can't. On the other hand, we might be smarter because we can stop...in any just about any frame... and they can't!
 
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top