Is Log of Molecules a Thermodynamic State Variable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter keith river
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    State Variable
keith river
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Is log (no of molecules) a state variable? I know that the no of molecules are a state variable so I assume the logarithm of this is still a state variable. Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In what context did you bump into this question ? Why is ln N there ?
 
It was just a question I found in a thermodynamics question book. The full question is
"State whether these are state variables or not... (list of quantities)... logarithm of number of molecules"
 
What is a state variable ? You need to be sure about the notions before attempting an answer.
 
State Variables are parameters which describe a thermodynamic system.
Some are inherent in the system (eg specific heat capacity) and some we can control (eg heat capacity)

I suppose since we can control N then ln N is to an extent controlled, but I don't know if it counts as a state variable.

Also (quick question to check an answer I made) is the melting and boiling points of a material a bulk property state variable. As they cannot be controlled but still tell us about the system?
 
I would say that a state variable must be a physical quantity and not some mathematical function of it.

As for the melting and boiling point, what do you mean by <cannot be controlled> ?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top