Is My Derivation of the Power Equation Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tourniquet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivation Power
AI Thread Summary
The derivation of the power equation presented is correct for calculating average power, as it involves the total work done divided by the total time taken. The initial equation for mechanical work, W = ∫ F · ds, is accurately referenced. To find instantaneous power, the approach shifts to an infinitesimal path, leading to P_inst = F · v, where v is the velocity. This confirms that instantaneous power is derived from the dot product of force and velocity. The discussion clarifies the distinction between average and instantaneous power calculations.
Tourniquet
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am working on a derivation of of the power equation. It is very simple, I would like to know if it is correct.

I started with the equation for mechanical work over a changing path, and changing force. This is from Wikipedia, and it agrees with my text.


W = \int F º ds

where: º is the symbol for dot product


F is the force vector; and
s is the position vector.

Then to make it power I just put (1/delta t) in front of it to make:

P = \frac{1}{\Delta t} \int F º ds

Let me know if this checks out.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct, in as much as you want to calculate the average power that the force did during the motion through the specified path. The reason is that you calculated the total work done through the motion, and divided that by the total time it took to complete that motion.

If you want to have the instantaneous power, then you have to limit yourself to an infinitesimal amount of path:

P_{inst} = \frac{1}{\delta t} \int_{\delta s} F . ds = \frac{F . \delta s}{\delta t} = F . \frac{\delta s}{\delta t} = F . v

So the instantaneous power done by a force on a moving point is given by the dot product of the force and the velocity of that point.
 
Thanks, I was going for average power.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top