Is my formula for piston height and velocity in an engine correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Townsend
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engine Model
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a mathematical formula for calculating the height of a piston above the crankshaft center based on the crankshaft radius and connecting rod length. The formula presented is f(x)=asin(x)+b√((1-a²cos²(x))/b²), which is differentiated to find the change in height with respect to the angle. The velocity of the piston is derived from this height function, incorporating RPM to express speed in length per minute. Feedback indicates that the formula is largely correct, with only minor typographical errors noted. Overall, the calculations and approach to determining piston height and velocity are validated by another contributor.
Townsend
Messages
232
Reaction score
0
I wasn't sure of where this question is best suited but since my interest is only mathematical I figured this is a good forum.

Using vectors I came up with a formula for the height of a piston above the center of the crankshaft for any given angle x (in radians). I set an x,y coordinate system with the origin at the center of the crank. With x=0 radians the crankshaft has the lower end of the connecting rod along the positive x-axis.

So if a is the radius of the crankshaft and b is the length of the connecting rod we have

<br /> f(x)=asin(x)+b \sqrt{ \frac{1-a^2cos^2(x)}{b^2} } <br />

So if that formula is correct then if I differentiate it I should have a formula for the change of height with respect to any given angle. This is
<br /> f&#039;(x)= \frac{a^2*b*sin(x)*cos(x)}{ \sqrt{ b^2-a^2*cos^2(x) }} +a*cos(x) <br />

So to get the velocity I need to take \frac{f&#039;*2 \pi*t}{minute} where t is any given rpm.

So if I did everything correctly I should be able to find the speed in units of length per minute of the piston for any given rpm t.

So did I make any mistakes so far? Or does everything seem ok?

Thanks for your time...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Apart from two typos, both involving b, your working is OK.

I derived the eqn for the piston speed using a different method and got the same eqn as yourself, so that provides some confrmation.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top