Is My Lagrangian Approach to This Inclined Plane Problem Correct?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the correct application of the Lagrangian approach to a problem involving a particle on an inclined plane that is changing its angle over time. The original Lagrangian proposed is L = (1/2)m(ẋ²) - mg(r-x)sin(θ), but concerns are raised about its accuracy due to the time-dependent nature of the incline. It is noted that the equations of motion derived do not account for the changing slope, leading to potential errors in the particle's velocity components. Suggestions are made to reconsider the Lagrangian formulation, including terms for both translational and rotational kinetic energy, and to ensure that the equations reflect the dynamics of the system accurately. The importance of consistent reference frame usage and the implications of a static versus dynamic incline are emphasized in determining the correct approach.
Rob Hal
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I posted this yesterday, but I figured I'd better post it again since the other thread can't be replied to at this time since its in the archives.

I'm looking for some advice on whether or not I'm doing a problem correctly.

The problem is:
A particle of mass m rests on a smooth plane. (the particle starts at r) The plane is raised to an inclination \theta, at a constant rate \alpha, with \theta = 0 at t=0, causing the particle to move down the plane.

So, I'm taking the x to be the distance the particle travels down the slope.

I come up with the following as the Lagrangian:

L = \frac{1}{2} m\dot{x}^2 - mg(r-x)sin\theta

I'm not sure if this is correct.

I would then get the equations of motion to be mgsin\theta - m\ddot{x}=0 and -mgsin(r-x)cos\theta=0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't seem to have explicitly factored in that the slope is changing in time. (There is no alpha dependence in your equations.) What this also means is that the velocity of the particle is not as simple as it seems, and is not along the inclined plane in the lab reference frame anyway. For example, the particle on the slope has velocity component perpendicular to the incline, that matches the incline's velocity at that point perpendicular to its surface.

Be careful about which reference frame you are using when you write down the equations.

One way to suspect that you don't quite have the right answer is that the solution you give would be the same for a static incline - do you really think the solution should be the same?
 
I'm also just learning about Lagrangians, and I probably would have made the same mistake without the above hint, but would the Lagrangian instead be:
L= \frac{1}{2}m \dot{r}^2 + \frac{1}{2}mr^{2}\dot{\theta}^{2} -mgrsin\theta
Is that correct?
 
I mean a much more elementary way to look at it is simple conservation of energy to find out what energy contributions there are.

KE: T trans + T rot
PE: V(y)

Ttrans: .5mr^2
T rot: .5Iw^2
V: mg(sin[theta])

where you would figure out I as a particle on a massless string.
 
I haven't had any formal training in solving Lagrange's equations, but here's what I would do:

\frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}} -\frac{\partial L}{\partial r}=0 and \frac{d}{dt} \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}} -\frac{\partial L}{\partial \theta}=0

Which I'd then solve to get:

m \ddot{r}+mgsin\theta=0 and mr^2 \ddot{\theta}+mgrcos\theta=0
Is that the right way to do it?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K