Is My Proof for Probabilities and Independence Correct?

AI Thread Summary
The proof presented for the probability of the union of independent events is correct, confirming that P(A1 ∪ A2 ∪ ... ∪ An) = 1 - Π(1 - P(Ai)). For the second exercise, to demonstrate that events A and B ∪ C are independent, it is necessary to show that P(A ∩ (B ∪ C)) equals P(A) * P(B ∪ C). This can be approached by expressing P(A ∩ (B ∪ C)) as P((A ∩ B) ∪ (A ∩ C)) and applying the independence definitions. Further clarification on the steps involved in this proof is encouraged for better understanding. The discussion effectively addresses both exercises in probability theory.
dionys
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi...Can you please check if my proof is correct?

Exercise:
A1,A2,...An are independently events.
Prove that :
P(A1[union]A2[union]...[union]An) = 1-Πi[element-of]I(1-P(Ai))

note for this (Πi[element-of]I(1-P(Ai))
I={1,2,...n)
P([intersect]Ai)= Π P(Ai)
for 3 events A1,A2,A3
means: P(A1[intersect]A2)=P(A1)*P(A2)
P(A2[intersect]A3)=P(A2)*P(A3)
P(A2[intersect]A3)=P(A2)*P(A3)
P(A1[intersect]A2[intersect]A3)=P(A1)* P(A2) * P(A3)


Now my proof:
We know that P([intersect]Ai)= Π P(Ai)
if A1,A2,...,An are independent then and the complements
are independent

P([intersect]Ai)complement = Π P(Aicomplement)
P([union](Ai compl) ) = Π(1-P(Ai))
1-P([union]Ai)= Π(1-P(Ai))
-P([union]Ai)=-1+Π(1-P(Ai))
Finally ... we got our proof
P([union]Ai)=1-Πi[element-of]I(1-P(Ai))
Is it correct?


And one more...
but i don't know how to prove this:
A,B,C are independent
We must prove that A and B[union]C are independent too
...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I couldn't follow some steps in your derivation (then again, it's pretty early here and I`m half asleep).

(Try using LateX, it makes your notation look more sexy. Click on the formulas to see the code.)

I would do the following:
P\left(\bigcup_{i=1}^n A_i\right)=1-P\left((\bigcup_{i=1}^n A_i)^c\right)=1-P\left(\bigcap_{i=1}^n A_i^c\right)=1-\prod_{i=1}^nP\left(A_i^c\right)=1-\prod_{i=1}^n(1-P\left(A_i)\right)
 


Hi there,

Your proof for the first exercise is correct! Good job.

For the second exercise, you can use the definition of independence to prove it. Recall that two events A and B are independent if and only if P(A[intersect]B) = P(A)*P(B). So, to prove that A and B[union]C are independent, we need to show that P(A[intersect](B[union]C)) = P(A)*P(B[union]C).

To do this, we can use the fact that P(A[intersect](B[union]C)) = P((A[intersect]B)[union](A[intersect]C)), and then use the definition of independence for A[intersect]B and A[intersect]C. Can you take it from here?

Let me know if you have any other questions or need further clarification. Good luck!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top