MHB Is My Solution to the Complex Algebraic Expression Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathdrama
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on evaluating the complex algebraic expression [32x^5y^4)^2/5/(4x^2)^2y^3/5]^-1. Participants clarify that the expression should be simplified by first inverting the fraction due to the negative exponent. The correct approach involves rewriting the expression and applying exponent rules to simplify the components step by step. Ultimately, the simplified result is determined to be 4x^2/y. Confusion arises regarding the placement of the exponent and its application to the entire expression versus individual components.
mathdrama
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I had to evaluate this: [32x^5y^4)^2/5/(4x^2)^2y^3/5]^-1

This is how I did it, but is it correct?

= [32^2/5x^2y^4(2/5)-1
(4x^2)^(2y^3/5)

= [32^2/5x^2y^8/5)^-1
(4x2)^(2y^3/5)

= [(^5√32)^2*x^2y^8/5)-1
(4x2)^(2y^3/5)

= [(2)^2*x^2y^8/5)-1
(4x^2)^(2y^3/5)

= [4*x^2y^8/5]^-1
(4x^2)^(2y^3/5)= [4x^2y^8/5]-1
(4x^2)^(2y^3/5)= (4x^2)(^2y^3/5)
4x^2y^8/5
I apologize for all the messiness.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Apart from all the messiness (of which there is a lot), I think that you may be getting towards the right answer. The final line of the calculation, $\dfrac{\text{(4x^2)(^2y^3/5)}}{\text{4x^2y^8/5}}$, makes no sense at all as it stands. But if you put one of the parentheses in the top row in a different position, so that it reads $\dfrac{\text{(4x^2)^2 y^(3/5)}} {\text{4x^2y^8/5}} = \dfrac{(4x^2)^2 y^{3/5}}{4x^2y^{8/5}}$, then you are on the right lines. But you can still simplify this further, by cancelling some of the stuff in the numerator with parts of the denominator.
 
Hello, mathdrama!

I think your problem looks like this:
\text{Simplify: }\:\left[\frac{(32x^5y^4)^{\frac{2}{5}}}{(4x^2)^2y^{\frac{3}{5}}}\right]^{-1}
A fraction to the minus-one power is inverted: .\left(\tfrac{a}{b}\right)^{-1} \:=\:\tfrac{b}{a}

\left[\frac{(32x^5y^4)^{\frac{2}{5}}}{(4x^2)^2y^{\frac{3}{5}}}\right]^{-1}

. . =\;\frac{(2^2\cdot x^2)^2\cdot y^{\frac{3}{5}}}{(2^5\cdot x^5\cdot y^4)^{\frac{2}{5}}}

. . =\;\frac{(2^2)^2\cdot (x^2)^2\cdot y^{\frac{3}{5}}} {(2^5)^{\frac{2}{5}}\cdot (x^5)^{\frac{2}{5}}\cdot (y^4)^{\frac{2}{5}}}

. . =\;\frac{2^4\cdot x^4\cdot y^{\frac{3}{5}}}{2^2\cdot x^2\cdot y^{\frac{8}{5}}}

. . =\;2^{4-2}\cdot x^{4-2}\cdot y^{\frac{3}{5}-\frac{8}{5}}

. . =\;2^2\cdot x^2\cdot y^{-1}

. . =\;\frac{4x^2}{y}
 
what i quite don't understand about this question "[32x^5y^4)^2/5/(4x^2)^2y^3/5]^-1" is after the first raise to the power of two (bold above) is the index devided by 5 and so on or is it the question so far that is divided by 5 and so on.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top