Is My Tri-Quadratic Curve Fit Equation Accurate Enough?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattskie
  • Start date Start date
mattskie
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hey,

So I am trying to do a tri-quadratic curve fit (linear regression) in excel. I have successfully completed a bi-quadratic, and it is of the form:
x+x^2+y+y^2+x*y+b (b is calculated by LINEST in excel)

My attempt at a tri-linear was:
x^2+x*y+x*z+y^2+y*z+z^2+b (b is calculated by LINEST in excel)

This equation was fairly accurate for my first few data points in the 4-curve family of curves I am attempting to curve fit, but after that the accuracy plummets.

I am assuming I am on the right track with this, as I attained some initial accuracy, but this equation isn't 100% because I can see it failing. Any/all help appreciated.

Note: I attempted to use the equation on http://www.rmi.ge/~kade/LecturesT.Ka...adraticLEC.pdf
but it gave an extremely erroneous solution.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should describe what you are trying to do. To do a cruve fit suggests you have some sort of data. You haven't explained the format of the data or how your notation relates to it. For example, it isn't clear whether your data is triples of the form (x,y,z). If it is, then why would you expect to fit a curve to such data by picking a value for the single parameter b ?
 
It doesn't appear that you are familiar with the way the LINEST function works, b ends up being the error +/- to fit the curve correctly. Much in the same way as bi-linear provides a b. I made the variables x,y,z for simplicities sake. If you need the data to provide the equation of a tri-quadratic equation (which you shouldn't, there should be an equation much like the bi-linear x+x^2+y+y^2+xy+b)

http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2uzxvdt&s=8 <---graph
http://tinypic.com/view.php?pic=2u3wsqt&s=8 <---data
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top