Is My Understanding of Angular Momentum and Trigonometry Correct?

Click For Summary
Angular momentum is defined as a vector quantity, represented by the equation L = Iω, where I is the moment of inertia and ω is the angular velocity. The discussion clarifies that for a point mass, the moment of inertia can be expressed as I = mr², and the relationship between linear and angular velocity is given by v = ω × r. The importance of using trigonometry and understanding cross products is emphasized for solving related problems. Additionally, there is a discrepancy in the mass value mentioned, which could affect calculations. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurately determining angular momentum in physics problems.
Xuran Wu
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A 2.5kg particle travels at a constant speed of 5m/s along the line shown in the figure. What is the magnitude of the particle’s angular momentum calculated from the origin?
A.10kg*m^2/s
B.24 kg*m^2/s
C.30 kg*m^2/s
D.32 kg*m^2/s
E.40 kg*m^2/s
Relevant Equations
L=l* ω, ω= Θ/t, α= ΔΘ/Δt
image.jpg

First, I have always consider that the angular momentum equals to inertia times angular velocity, but that’s not the case from the options perpective, is my memory wrong, or is there something wrong with the options?
Another, I think I need to figure out the angle it went through, I think it has something to do with trigonometry, but I am not sure, and I cannot find a way to solve it.
Can anyone can help me with this? Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your relevant equations apply to a rotating rigid body. This is not the problem at hand.

How is the angular momentum of a particle relative to any point defined?

Edit: I’ll also note that your statement says a mass of 2.5 kg, but the illustration seems to specify 2 kg. Which of these it is will of course affect the result.
 
Also, you should double-check whether the mass is 2.5 kg (problem text) or 2 kg (figure)
 
Xuran Wu said:
First, I have always consider that the angular momentum equals to inertia times angular velocity, ##\dots##
That's not quite correct. Angular momentum is a vector and one should write a vector equation ##\vec L=I\vec {\omega}.## Yes, a point mass may be considered as a rigid body with moment of inertia ##I=mr^2## but you need to be careful.

Here, the linear velocity is related to the angular velocity by ##\vec v=\vec {\omega}\times \vec r.## Now$$\vec r\times\vec v=\vec r\times(\vec {\omega}\times \vec r)=\vec{\omega}(\vec r\cdot \vec r)-\vec r(\vec r\cdot \vec{\omega})=r^2\vec{\omega} \implies \vec{\omega}=\frac{\vec r\times\vec v}{r^2}.$$Then $$L=I\vec {\omega}=mr^2\frac{\vec r\times\vec v}{r^2}=m\vec r\times \vec v=\vec r \times \vec p.$$ Your modified diagram below shows what you need to consider. Yes, you need to use trigonometry and your knowledge of cross products. Note that
  1. ##\sin(\pi-\theta)=\sin\theta##
  2. The perpendicular distance from the origin to the particle's path ##r_p## is the same no matter where the particle is.
  3. You have a 3-4-5 triangle.

AngMomParticle.png
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
67
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 30 ·
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
604
  • · Replies 71 ·
2
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
Replies
45
Views
4K