Is Normalizing a 4x4 Matrix Possible Using Multiple Methods?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on normalizing a 4x4 matrix using various methods. The normalization constant is defined as N=4-2g^2+2f^2. Three methods for calculating N are proposed: method 1 involves using N=\sqrt{\sum{X^2}}, method 2 suggests finding the determinant, and method 3 focuses on the ratio of integrals of excited and normal state matrices. The consensus indicates that the normalization should satisfy the condition G^2=1, and the trace of the matrix should be normalized by dividing the matrix by its trace, provided the trace is not zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix normalization techniques
  • Familiarity with matrix trace and determinant concepts
  • Knowledge of integral calculus related to matrix states
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical functions and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research matrix normalization techniques in linear algebra
  • Learn about calculating the trace and determinant of matrices
  • Explore integral calculus applications in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate advanced matrix normalization methods for quantum states
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with matrix operations, particularly those involved in quantum mechanics and linear algebra applications.

wondering12
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
I am trying to normalize 4x4 matrix (g and f are functions):

\begin{equation}
G=\begin{matrix}
(1-g^2) &0& 0& 0&\\
0& (1+f^2)& (-g^2-f^2)& 0 \\
0 &(-g^2-f^2)& (1+f^2)& 0 &\\
0& 0& 0& (1-g^2)
\end{matrix}
\end{equation}

It's a matrix that's in a research paper (which I don't have) which gives the normalization constant as: N=4-2g^2+2f^2.
I've been looking up online and found that N can be found with:

method 1: N=\sqrt{\sum{X^2}} where X represents the elements of the matrix.

method 2: I also found somewhere which said that I need to find the determinant.

method 3: The ratio between the integral of excited state matrix and the integral of normal state of the matrix.

I'm not sure who's right, but I'm not getting what was on paper.

For method [1] I'm getting as far as: N^2 = 4(1+f^4+f^2g^2+f^2) . So I backtracked to see if their N^2 matches my N^2. But their N^2=16+4g^4+4f^4+16g^2-8g^2f^2+16f^2.

Note that the normalization must satisfy the following condition G^2=1

Any comments about all methods mentioned and how to implement it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What about the matrix are you trying to normalize?

I notice that if you sum down the diagonal of the matrix that you get ##4-2g^2-2f^2##, which is the normalization constant you quote. So presumably you're trying to normalize the trace? In that case... just divide the matrix by its trace. The resulting matrix will have a trace of 1, unless the trace was 0 in which case you're not going to be able to normalize.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: wondering12
Yes, you are correct. The paper normalizes the trace and your answer is correct for that part. I admit that I asked to many question on this one, because when I mentioned normalizing condition $G^2=1$ that is a different story...That is probably normalizing the whole matrix which can be implement with method 3 which I am not familiar with.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K