Is Oxygen Really Converted Into Energy in Our Bodies?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of hypoxia and the process of energy production in the body. A pamphlet by an M.D. suggests that hypoxia involves the inability to transform oxygen into energy, which raises questions about the accuracy of this claim. The original poster recalls learning that energy from metabolism primarily comes from carbohydrates rather than oxygen. They express confusion over the idea that oxygen could be "transformed" into energy, likening it to a nuclear reaction. A participant clarifies that the pamphlet is poorly worded and confirms that while oxygen plays a crucial role in metabolism, it is not the direct source of energy; rather, carbohydrates are the primary fuel.
Will Anderson
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I just started reading a pamphlet written my an M.D. about a poorly understood illness.

On the second page he writes: "Hypoxia is a technical term meaning the inability to transform oxygen into energy." On the next page he writes: "It is due to a problem at the cellular level converting oxygen into energy."

I didn't do very well in high school chemistry, and that was over fifty years ago, but I seem to recall that we were taught back then that the energy released by metabolism came from the carbohydrates that were being "burned," not from the oxygen.

I mean, oxygen is an element, so it would seem that a process to "transform oxygen into energy" would require "splitting" the atom in something like a nuclear reaction, wouldn't it?

Have I been laboring under a misconception for over half a century?

Is oxygen actually "converted" or "transformed" into energy in our bodies at the cellular level?

Will Anderson
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
The pamphlet was poorly worded. You have an accurate understanding as to where energy comes from. Oxygen is involved but not the source of the energy.
 
It seems like a simple enough question: what is the solubility of epsom salt in water at 20°C? A graph or table showing how it varies with temperature would be a bonus. But upon searching the internet I have been unable to determine this with confidence. Wikipedia gives the value of 113g/100ml. But other sources disagree and I can't find a definitive source for the information. I even asked chatgpt but it couldn't be sure either. I thought, naively, that this would be easy to look up without...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
Back
Top