Is physics the right major for me?

  • Thread starter Thread starter kekait
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around an individual contemplating a major in Physics, motivated by a desire to understand the universe and influenced by an atheist perspective. Concerns are raised about the necessary intelligence and mathematical skills required for success in the field. Participants emphasize that serious dedication and a genuine interest in physics and mathematics are crucial for studying the subject, regardless of one's background. The conversation also touches on the misconception that atheism is inherently linked to a better understanding of science, with contributors noting that both atheists and theists can possess varying levels of scientific knowledge. The importance of curiosity and the willingness to learn is highlighted, suggesting that anyone can pursue physics with the right mindset and effort, regardless of age or prior academic performance.
kekait
Hello. I'm currently at the point in my life when one must make a decision on what they want to focus their study on in school. I have recently gained an interest in Physics because of my atheist background and wanting to know more about the universe in which we live. I don't know if I have what it takes to make this my major and, would like to know what you actually will learn? Do you have to be "smart"? I'm 25 years old and to be honest, haven't really been serious about my studies up until now. My math comprehension is not the best but, I feel I can understand mathematical problems if explained to me. I would like to hear some of your opinions. Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
??why do you think you have to be atheist to be interested in physics. That is kind of insulting to people that study physics that aren't atheist. Math is very important and physics requires you to be very serious about your studies. Even for some of the smartest people I know, they study massive amounts.
 
What do you want to do with your knowledge of physics? What do you want to do for a living after you graduate?
 
462chevelle said:
??why do you think you have to be atheist to be interested in physics. That is kind of insulting to people that study physics that aren't atheist. Math is very important and physics requires you to be very serious about your studies. Even for some of the smartest people I know, they study massive amounts.

sorry for coming off as being insulting. That wasn't my intentions. I was only stating this because having no belief in a god has sparked an interest of mine to study the natural world. That being physics.
 
russ_watters said:
What do you want to do with your knowledge of physics? What do you want to do for a living after you graduate?

Possibly teach others why science is important. I really never had an interest in teaching till I noticed the lack of understanding by some people. Particularly those of faith (not trying to be insulting here).
 
kekait said:
I noticed the lack of understanding by some people. Particularly those of faith (not trying to be insulting here).

I have noticed many atheists have a very shoddy understanding of science too. I don't personally think it has much to do with religion anyway. Both groups have people twisting the facts to fit their worldview.
 
R136a1 said:
I have noticed many atheists have a very shoddy understanding of science too. I don't personally think it has much to do with religion anyway. Both groups have people twisting the facts to fit their worldview.

I think this thread is starting to go off-topic but, I will respond to your viewpoints. I agree that your religions ous views (or lack thereof) have nothing to do with your understanding of the sciences. You can probably tell that from my original post that I too don't have a full understanding of what it means to be a physics major but, there is a difference between what atheist and theist claim to be the absolute truth. We are still fighting for evolution to be taught in school in some parts of the U. S. I would like for you to provide an example of an atheist using "shoddy" science to manipulate their worldview.
 
Speaking of evolution..

Ota_Benga_at_Bronx_Zoo.jpg


Poor man.
 
I'm glad someone understands.
 
  • #10
kekait said:
Hello. I'm currently at the point in my life when one must make a decision on what they want to focus their study on in school. I have recently gained an interest in Physics ... I don't know if I have what it takes to make this my major ...
So You Want To Be A Physicist
Written by ZapperZ
 
  • #11
kekait said:
I think this thread is starting to go off-topic but, I will respond to your viewpoints. I agree that your religions ous views (or lack thereof) have nothing to do with your understanding of the sciences. You can probably tell that from my original post that I too don't have a full understanding of what it means to be a physics major but, there is a difference between what atheist and theist claim to be the absolute truth. We are still fighting for evolution to be taught in school in some parts of the U. S. I would like for you to provide an example of an atheist using "shoddy" science to manipulate their worldview.

I'm fully aware that my experiences might not be representative.

But anyway, I get the feeling that many atheists try to idolize science and mathematics, while it in fact is prone to many mistakes. For example, an atheist might bring up experiments by Miller and Urey to say "See, we don't need a God to explain the origin of life." While in fact they don't mention (and probably don't even know), that Miller-Urey is extremely far away from explaing an origin of life, so I find making the connection dishonest. Many atheists have significant troubles with saying "science doesn't know" or that a certain scientific theory is wrong".

For example, I once discussed with an atheist who had so many wrong thoughts about science. For example, he thought that physicists were able to derive new laws analytically and never made guesses of any kind. Anybody with a bit of experience in science will know the converse is true. For example, the Schrodinger equation is (as far as I know) a complete lucky guess which turned out to be compatible with experiments. He also said that if a theory is incompatible with experiments, then the math is wrong and the scientists are dumb. This is of course very silly. A theory might be mathematically very sound, but it might just happen not to agree with experiment. Failed theories are abundant in science. The fact that a scientific theory can turn out to be wrong (= not to describe the real world), was very unsettling to him for some reason.

Finally, I have met several people claiming " 1 = 1 thus the big bang happened". And those people really do mean what they said. Never even mind that they completely misunderstand what the big bang theory says.

Obviously, I'm not saying all atheists are idiots. But some are severely uneducated about the practice of science. The danger is however that they think they do know all this stuff and they are so certain of their own understanding. So for me, atheists are not better or more rational than theists. Some people of either groups are very bright, others have a shoddy understanding and think they know more than they do.
 
  • #12
Thanks for staying on topic!
 
  • #13
The important thing for me as someone who believes in God. It doesn't bother me to learn anything that science has to offer, including the idea of the big bang. That doesn't mean I have to believe everything I learn 100%. The important thing is that you like physics for some reason and you have a general curiosity about it in your everyday life. I work as a diesel mechanic so every time I turn around I'm thinking about forces and static situations, or how rigid things are. makes me want to go learn about how I can figure out what would happen in certain instances. most people I know that try to study physics that really hate it. They are the people that never ask why or how. I have a friend that got an b in phys. 1 and an a in phys. 2 and he couldn't care less about physics. Why and how are the last things going through his head in any given situation. I think these things are important as well as being a real smart person. I'm not a real smart person compared to 99% of the people on here, but I have no fear of learning everything about math and physics I can. I just ask a TON of questions. Going to college is about learning and just make sure your competent in math at a college algebra level at least and some basic physics understanding and I think a person could start at year 1 and learn anything with the correct amount of study.
 
  • #14
Learning it to understand the universe we live in is the best possible reason to learn physics. I think you can do it, and no, you don't have to be smart to do physics. If you don't understand the math the way the university teaches it you can always brush learn it online. khan academy and patrickjmt on youtube do an excellent job, also you are never too old to learn. One of my uncles is 70 and he went to university. Good Luck.
 
  • #15
R136a1 said:
But some [atheists] are severely uneducated about the practice of science.
That is a pointless statement. Pick multiple (not too obscure) properties a human can have, and you can find a group of those who have all of them.
This is possible even with "religious" and "atheist": interesting video

kekait said:
I have recently gained an interest in Physics because of my atheist background and wanting to know more about the universe in which we live. I don't know if I have what it takes to make this my major and, would like to know what you actually will learn? Do you have to be "smart"?
To study physics, you have to enjoy physics and mathematics (which is nearly equivalent to "be interested in physics and mathematics ", I think), and you need a lot of time. Apart from that... yeah, should be fine.

462chevelle said:
I'm not a real smart person compared to 99% of the people on here
What looks "smart" can be just more experience.
 
  • #16
Tru dat. There is a difference between knowledge and intelligence.
 
  • #17
mfb said:
That is a pointless statement. Pick multiple (not too obscure) properties a human can have, and you can find a group of those who have all of them.
This is possible even with "religious" and "atheist": interesting video

I never claimed my statement only applied to atheists.
 
  • #18
R136a1 said:
I never claimed my statement only applied to atheists.
But where is your point then? "Some are severely uneducated about the practice of science." is even more trivial.
 
  • #19
mfb said:
But where is your point then? "Some are severely uneducated about the practice of science." is even more trivial.
Another poster made the comment that those of faith are particularly ignorant and R136 is commenting that in his experience atheists are as ignorant. That's my experience too.
 
  • #20
What looks "smart" can be just more experience.[/QUOTE]

well then, maybe there is some hope for me.
 
Back
Top